Literature DB >> 18320163

[Radiation dose in computed tomography. Risks and challenges].

M Prokop1.   

Abstract

The exponentially growing performance of newer scanner generations has increased diagnostic opportunities and utilization of computed tomography. The excellent clinical results with CT, however, have to be weighed against a high radiation exposure. While radiation exposure with modern scanners is well below the diagnostic reference values of the EU for most organ systems, radiation dose for retrospectively gated cardiac examinations can be substantially higher: organ doses can reach 100 mGy, a dose for which cancer induction been proven. For children, the situation may also be critical if scanning parameters are not adapted to their smaller size and increased radiation risk: the risk-benefit ratio may then no longer favor CT. The application of CT for young patients, patients with favorable prognosis and for frequent follow-up examinations will increase the radiation risk to the individual and the population. The growth rates for CT utilization in Germany are well below those in the United States but the increasing number of exams will lead to a substantial increase in population dose even if the dose per individual exam can be reduced. The combination of optimum scanning parameters, automated dose modulation and dose adaptation to the individual patient will help contain radiation dose. Further reduction is possible by reducing the number of scan phases, limiting the scan length and choosing a lower tube voltage. Most important, however, is the close collaboration with referring physicians: scanning technique and choice of imaging modality can only be adapted if the clinical question is clearly defined. In the light of radiation exposure the critical and knowledgeable use of CT becomes the more important the easier it is to request an exam and the better the clinical results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18320163     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-008-1635-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  32 in total

1.  [Optimizing dosage in thoracic computerized tomography].

Authors:  M Prokop
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  The weight of evidence does not support the suggestion that exposure to low doses of X rays increases longevity.

Authors:  Eric J Hall; David J Brenner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Balancing the normal appendectomy rate with the perforated appendicitis rate: implications for quality assurance.

Authors:  V Velanovich; R Satava
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  16-slice CT: achievable effective doses of common protocols in comparison with recent CT dose surveys.

Authors:  A J Van der Molen; W J H Veldkamp; J Geleijns
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT.

Authors:  D Brenner; C Elliston; E Hall; W Berdon
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  The effect of dose reduction and feasibility of edge-preserving noise reduction on the detection of liver lesions using MSCT.

Authors:  Johannes Wessling; Rainer Esseling; Rainer Raupach; Stefanie Fockenberg; Nani Osada; Joachim Gerss; Walter Heindel; Roman Fischbach
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT.

Authors:  Mannudeep K Kalra; Michael M Maher; Thomas L Toth; Bernhard Schmidt; Bryan L Westerman; Hugh T Morgan; Sanjay Saini
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Automatic exposure control in multichannel CT with tube current modulation to achieve a constant level of image noise: experimental assessment on pediatric phantoms.

Authors:  Hervé J Brisse; Ludovic Madec; Geneviève Gaboriaud; Thomas Lemoine; Alexia Savignoni; Sylvia Neuenschwander; Bernard Aubert; Jean-Claude Rosenwald
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer.

Authors:  David J Brenner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  10 in total

1.  [Principles of multidetector-row computed tomography. Part 2: determinants of radiation exposure and current technical developments].

Authors:  W Stiller
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  [Strategies for reducing the CT radiation dose].

Authors:  S T Schindera; C Nauer; R Treier; P Trueb; G von Allmen; P Vock; Z Szucs-Farkas
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  Computed tomographies and cancer risk in children: a literature overview of CT practices, risk estimations and an epidemiologic cohort study proposal.

Authors:  Lucian Krille; Hajo Zeeb; Andreas Jahnen; Peter Mildenberger; Michael Seidenbusch; Karl Schneider; Gerald Weisser; Gael Hammer; Peter Scholz; Maria Blettner
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Computed tomography angiography of the carotid arteries at low kV settings: a prospective randomised trial assessing radiation dose and diagnostic confidence.

Authors:  Dietrich Beitzke; Florian Wolf; Gundula Edelhauser; Christina Plank; Rüdiger Schernthaner; Michael Weber; Richard Nolz; Johannes Lammer; Christian Loewe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  [Principles of multidetector-row computed tomography : part 1. Technical design and physicotechnical principles].

Authors:  W Stiller
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Ultra-low-dose periradicular infiltration of the lumbar spine: spot scanning and its potential for further dose reduction by replacing helical planning CT.

Authors:  Fabian Henry Jürgen Elsholtz; Lars-Arne Schaafs; Christoph Erxleben; Bernd Hamm; Stefan Markus Niehues
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  A Customizable Multimodality Imaging Compound That Relates External Landmarks to Internal Structures.

Authors:  Mulugeta Semework
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2015-09-03

8.  Trends of CT utilisation in an emergency department in Taiwan: a 5-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Sung-Yuan Hu; Ming-Shun Hsieh; Meng-Yu Lin; Chiann-Yi Hsu; Tzu-Chieh Lin; Chorng-Kuang How; Chen-Yu Wang; Jeffrey Che-Hung Tsai; Yu-Hui Wu; Yan-Zin Chang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Pediatric computed tomography practice in Japanese university hospitals from 2008-2010: did it differ from German practice?

Authors:  Koji Yoshida; Lucian Krille; Steffen Dreger; Lars Hoenig; Hiltrud Merzenich; Kiyotaka Yasui; Atsushi Kumagai; Akira Ohtsuru; Masataka Uetani; Peter Mildenberger; Noboru Takamura; Shunichi Yamashita; Hajo Zeeb; Takashi Kudo
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  Radiation dose in paediatric computed tomography: risks and benefits.

Authors:  G I Ogbole
Journal:  Ann Ib Postgrad Med       Date:  2010-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.