Kim Sivesgaard1, Lars P Larsen2, Michael Sørensen3, Stine Kramer4, Sven Schlander2, Nerijus Amanavicius2, Arindam Bharadwaz2, Dennis Tønner Nielsen2, Frank Viborg Mortensen5, Erik Morre Pedersen2. 1. Department of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, NBG Noerrebrogade 44, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark. kimsives@rm.dk. 2. Department of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, NBG Noerrebrogade 44, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark. 3. Department of Hepatology & Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, NBG Noerrebrogade 44, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark. 4. Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET-Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, NBG Noerrebrogade 44, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark. 5. Department of Surgery (section for upper gastrointestinal and hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery), Aarhus University Hospital, NBG Noerrebrogade 44, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and combined fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for detection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) in patients eligible for local treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This health-research ethics-committee-approved prospective consecutive diagnostic accuracy study, with written informed consent, included 80 cases (76 patients, four participating twice) between 29 June 2015 and 7 February 2017. Prior chemotherapy or local treatment did not exclude participation. Combined FDG-PET/CT including CE-CT and MRI was performed within 0-3 days shortly before local treatment. CE-CT and MRI images were read independently by two readers for each modality. The combined FDG-PET/CT images were read independently by two pairs of readers. A composite reference standard was used. Sensitivities, specificities and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCROC) were calculated and compared. RESULTS: In total, 260 CRLMs were confirmed. The MRI readers had significantly higher per-lesion sensitivity (85.9% and 83.8%) than both CE-CT readers (69.1% and 62.3%) and both PET/CT reader pairs (72.0% and 72.1%) (p<0.001). There were no significant differences in per-lesion specificity. MRI readers had significantly higher AUCROC (0.92 and 0.88) than both CE-CT readers (0.80 and 0.82) (p≤0.001). AUCROC for MR reader 1 was higher than that of both PET/CT reader pairs (0.83 and 0.84) (p≤0.0001). CONCLUSION: MRI performed significantly better than both CE-CT and combined FDG-PET/CT for detection of CRLM in consecutive patients eligible for local treatment irrespective of prior chemotherapy or local treatment. KEY POINTS: • Patients eligible for local treatment of colorectal liver-metastases require optimal imaging. • In 80 consecutive patients, MRI had superior per lesion diagnostic performance. • Findings were independent of prior treatment and type of planned local treatment. • Equally, MRI had superior diagnostic performance on per segment basis.
PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and combined fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for detection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) in patients eligible for local treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This health-research ethics-committee-approved prospective consecutive diagnostic accuracy study, with written informed consent, included 80 cases (76 patients, four participating twice) between 29 June 2015 and 7 February 2017. Prior chemotherapy or local treatment did not exclude participation. Combined FDG-PET/CT including CE-CT and MRI was performed within 0-3 days shortly before local treatment. CE-CT and MRI images were read independently by two readers for each modality. The combined FDG-PET/CT images were read independently by two pairs of readers. A composite reference standard was used. Sensitivities, specificities and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCROC) were calculated and compared. RESULTS: In total, 260 CRLMs were confirmed. The MRI readers had significantly higher per-lesion sensitivity (85.9% and 83.8%) than both CE-CT readers (69.1% and 62.3%) and both PET/CT reader pairs (72.0% and 72.1%) (p<0.001). There were no significant differences in per-lesion specificity. MRI readers had significantly higher AUCROC (0.92 and 0.88) than both CE-CT readers (0.80 and 0.82) (p≤0.001). AUCROC for MR reader 1 was higher than that of both PET/CT reader pairs (0.83 and 0.84) (p≤0.0001). CONCLUSION: MRI performed significantly better than both CE-CT and combined FDG-PET/CT for detection of CRLM in consecutive patients eligible for local treatment irrespective of prior chemotherapy or local treatment. KEY POINTS: • Patients eligible for local treatment of colorectal liver-metastases require optimal imaging. • In 80 consecutive patients, MRI had superior per lesion diagnostic performance. • Findings were independent of prior treatment and type of planned local treatment. • Equally, MRI had superior diagnostic performance on per segment basis.
Authors: Anselm Schulz; Ellen Viktil; Johannes Clemens Godt; Cathrine K Johansen; Johann Baptist Dormagen; Jon Erik Holtedahl; Knut Jørgen Labori; Tore Bach-Gansmo; Nils-Einar Kløw Journal: Acta Radiol Date: 2015-11-29 Impact factor: 1.990
Authors: Tessa S S Genders; Sandra Spronk; Theo Stijnen; Ewout W Steyerberg; Emmanuel Lesaffre; M G Myriam Hunink Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-10-23 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Vanessa Kulemann; Wolfgang Schima; Dietmar Tamandl; Klaus Kaczirek; Thomas Gruenberger; Friedrich Wrba; Michael Weber; Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2010-04-13 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: An Tang; Justin Tan; Mark Sun; Gavin Hamilton; Mark Bydder; Tanya Wolfson; Anthony C Gamst; Michael Middleton; Elizabeth M Brunt; Rohit Loomba; Joel E Lavine; Jeffrey B Schwimmer; Claude B Sirlin Journal: Radiology Date: 2013-02-04 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Waleed Shady; Elena N Petre; Mithat Gonen; Joseph P Erinjeri; Karen T Brown; Anne M Covey; William Alago; Jeremy C Durack; Majid Maybody; Lynn A Brody; Robert H Siegelbaum; Michael I D'Angelica; William R Jarnagin; Stephen B Solomon; Nancy E Kemeny; Constantinos T Sofocleous Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-08-12 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Hye Jin Kim; Seung Soo Lee; Jae Ho Byun; Jin Cheon Kim; Chang Sik Yu; Seong Ho Park; Ah Young Kim; Hyun Kwon Ha Journal: Radiology Date: 2014-10-03 Impact factor: 11.105