Literature DB >> 17021837

Memory processes in multiple-target visual search.

Christof Körner1, Iain D Gilchrist.   

Abstract

Gibson, Li, Skow, Brown, and Cooke (Psychological Science, 11, 324-327, 2000) had participants carry out a search task in which they were required to detect the presence of one or two targets. In order to successfully perform such a multiple-target visual search task, participants had to remember the location of the first target while searching for the second target. In two experiments we investigated the cost of remembering this target location. In Experiment 1, we compared performance on the Gibson et al. task with performance on a more conventional present-absent search task. The comparison suggests a substantial performance cost as measured by reaction time, number of fixations and slope of the search functions. In Experiment 2, we looked in detail at refixations of distractors, which are a direct measure of attentional deployment. We demonstrated that the cost in this multiple-target visual search task was due to an increased number of refixations on previously visited distractors. Such refixations were present right from the start of the search. This change in search behaviour may be caused by the necessity of having to remember a target-allocating memory for the upcoming target may consume memory capacity that may otherwise be available for the tagging of distractors. These results support the notion of limited capacity memory processes in search.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17021837     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-006-0075-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  20 in total

1.  Searching for one versus two identical targets: when visual search has a memory.

Authors:  B S Gibson; L Li; E Skow; K Brown; L Cooke
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-07

2.  Is visual search really like foraging?

Authors:  I D Gilchrist; A North; B Hood
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Visual search has memory.

Authors:  M S Peterson; A F Kramer; R F Wang; D E Irwin; J S McCarley
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-07

4.  On the manifestations of memory in visual search.

Authors:  D I Shore; R M Klein
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2000

5.  Moving towards solutions to some enduring controversies in visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M. Wolfe
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Finding a new target in an old display: evidence for a memory recency effect in visual search.

Authors:  Christof Körner; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

7.  Patterns of eye movements during parallel and serial visual search tasks.

Authors:  D E Williams; E M Reingold; M Moscovitch; M Behrmann
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1997-06

8.  Conjunctive search for one and two identical targets.

Authors:  R Ward; J L McClelland
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Impaired spatial working memory across saccades contributes to abnormal search in parietal neglect.

Authors:  M Husain; S Mannan; T Hodgson; E Wojciulik; J Driver; C Kennard
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-04
View more
  13 in total

1.  Finding a new target in an old display: evidence for a memory recency effect in visual search.

Authors:  Christof Körner; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

2.  Refixation control in free viewing: a specialized mechanism divulged by eye-movement-related brain activity.

Authors:  Andrey R Nikolaev; Radha Nila Meghanathan; Cees van Leeuwen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The interplay of episodic and semantic memory in guiding repeated search in scenes.

Authors:  Melissa L-H Võ; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-11-21

4.  Seek and you shall remember: scene semantics interact with visual search to build better memories.

Authors:  Dejan Draschkow; Jeremy M Wolfe; Melissa L H Võ
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Generalized "satisfaction of search": adverse influences on dual-target search accuracy.

Authors:  Mathias S Fleck; Ehsan Samei; Stephen R Mitroff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2010-03

Review 6.  The role of memory for visual search in scenes.

Authors:  Melissa Le-Hoa Võ; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  When does repeated search in scenes involve memory? Looking at versus looking for objects in scenes.

Authors:  Melissa L-H Võ; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Fixation duration surpasses pupil size as a measure of memory load in free viewing.

Authors:  Radha Nila Meghanathan; Cees van Leeuwen; Andrey R Nikolaev
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Post-search IOR: Searching for inhibition of return after search.

Authors:  Margit Höfler; Katrin Liebergesell; Iain D Gilchrist; Sebastian A Bauch; Anja Ischebeck; Christof Körner
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2019-05-10

10.  Sequential effects in continued visual search: using fixation-related potentials to compare distractor processing before and after target detection.

Authors:  Christof Körner; Verena Braunstein; Matthias Stangl; Alois Schlögl; Christa Neuper; Anja Ischebeck
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.