Literature DB >> 2531203

Conjunctive search for one and two identical targets.

R Ward1, J L McClelland.   

Abstract

The assumptions of feature integration theory as a blind, serial, self-terminating search (SSTS) mechanism are extended to displays containing 2 identical targets. The SSTS predicts no differences in negative-response displays, which require an exhaustive search of the display. Quantitative predictions are confirmed for the positive responses, but not for the negatives, suggesting that the SSTS model is incorrect. Two possible explanations for the results in the negative conditions, differential search rates and early quitting in the negatives, are rejected. It is suggested that using any self-terminating search mechanism will lead to difficulty in interpreting the results, including accounts for which the search is parallel over small groups of items. A resource-limited parallel model, which is based on the diffusion model of Ratcliff (1978), appears to fit the data well.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2531203     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.15.4.664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  18 in total

1.  The temporal dynamics of visual search: evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches.

Authors:  B McElree; M Carrasco
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  A comparison of two response time models applied to perceptual matching.

Authors:  T Van Zandt; H Colonius; R W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-06

3.  Attention in visual search: multiple search classes.

Authors:  M Cheal; D R Lyon
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-08

Review 4.  Serial vs. parallel models of attention in visual search: accounting for benchmark RT-distributions.

Authors:  Rani Moran; Michael Zehetleitner; Heinrich René Liesefeld; Hermann J Müller; Marius Usher
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

5.  Search performance without eye movements.

Authors:  R Klein; M Farrell
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-11

6.  Merging race models and adaptive networks: a parallel race network.

Authors:  Denis Cousineau
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-10

7.  Memory processes in multiple-target visual search.

Authors:  Christof Körner; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-09-22

8.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search.

Authors:  J M Wolfe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-06

9.  Incidental learning speeds visual search by lowering response thresholds, not by improving efficiency: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Functional modular architecture underlying attentional control in aging.

Authors:  Zachary A Monge; Benjamin R Geib; Rachel E Siciliano; Lauren E Packard; Catherine W Tallman; David J Madden
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.