Literature DB >> 11817753

Is visual search really like foraging?

I D Gilchrist1, A North, B Hood.   

Abstract

The visual-search paradigm provides a controlled and easy to implement experimental situation in which to study the search process. However, little work has been carried out in humans to investigate the extent to which traditional visual-search tasks are similar to more general search or foraging. Here we report results from a task in which search involves walking around a room and leaning down to inspect individual locations. Consistent with more traditional search tasks, search time increases linearly with display size, and the target-present to target-absent search slope is 1:2. However, although rechecking of locations did occur, compared to more traditional search it was relatively rare, suggesting an increased role for memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11817753     DOI: 10.1068/p3249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  20 in total

1.  Going the distance: spatial scale of athletic experience affects the accuracy of path integration.

Authors:  Alastair D Smith; Christina J Howard; Niall Alcock; Kirsten Cater
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Memory processes in multiple-target visual search.

Authors:  Christof Körner; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-09-22

3.  Fruitful visual search: inhibition of return in a virtual foraging task.

Authors:  Laura E Thomas; Michael S Ambinder; Brendon Hsieh; Brian Levinthal; James A Crowell; David E Irwin; Arthur F Kramer; Alejandro Lleras; Daniel J Simons; Ranxiao Frances Wang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

4.  Mechanisms of large-scale environmental search: probability cueing depends on the relationship between landmarks and target distribution.

Authors:  Alastair D Smith; Felicity Wallace; Bruce Hood; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2009-09

Review 5.  Guidance of visual search by memory and knowledge.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2012

6.  Children with autism are neither systematic nor optimal foragers.

Authors:  Elizabeth Pellicano; Alastair D Smith; Filipe Cristino; Bruce M Hood; Josie Briscoe; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Eye guidance in natural vision: reinterpreting salience.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler; Mary M Hayhoe; Michael F Land; Dana H Ballard
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Learning where to look for a hidden target.

Authors:  Leanne Chukoskie; Joseph Snider; Michael C Mozer; Richard J Krauzlis; Terrence J Sejnowski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Visual search and foraging compared in a large-scale search task.

Authors:  Alastair D Smith; Bruce M Hood; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2008-01-10

10.  Attention as foraging for information and value.

Authors:  Sanjay G Manohar; Masud Husain
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.