Literature DB >> 18087948

Finding a new target in an old display: evidence for a memory recency effect in visual search.

Christof Körner1, Iain D Gilchrist.   

Abstract

Visual search often involves searching the same environment, consecutively, for a number of different targets. Here we investigate the extent to which search benefits from such previous exposure. In the experiment participants searched the same display consecutively for two different targets. Manual responses were faster in the second search than the first search regardless of whether a target was present or absent in the second search. Eye movement recordings demonstrated that the time necessary to find a target letter in the second search depended on when that letter was last fixated in the previous search. This fixation recency effect lasted for about four fixations. In addition, when a target was absent during the second search, participants were less likely to refixate a distractor if it had been recently fixated in the previous search and refixations tended to also occur later on in the search. These results provide evidence for a limited capacity short-term memory store in this kind of visual search.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18087948     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  15 in total

1.  Postattentive vision.

Authors:  J M Wolfe; N Klempen; K Dahlen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Visual search has memory.

Authors:  M S Peterson; A F Kramer; R F Wang; D E Irwin; J S McCarley
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-07

3.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

4.  On the manifestations of memory in visual search.

Authors:  D I Shore; R M Klein
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2000

5.  An unbinding problem? The disintegration of visible, previously attended objects does not attract attention.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Aude Oliva; Serena J Butcher; Helga C Arsenio
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Serial position curves in verbal learning.

Authors:  J W MCCRARY; W S HUNTER
Journal:  Science       Date:  1953-02-06       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Automatic and intentional memory processes in visual search.

Authors:  Walter R Boot; Jason S McCarley; Arthur F Kramer; Mathew S Peterson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-10

8.  Memory for where, but not what, is used during visual search.

Authors:  Melissa R Beck; Matthew S Peterson; Miroslava Vomela
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Memory processes in multiple-target visual search.

Authors:  Christof Körner; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-09-22

10.  Refixation frequency and memory mechanisms in visual search.

Authors:  I D Gilchrist; M Harvey
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-10-05       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  15 in total

1.  Memory processes in multiple-target visual search.

Authors:  Christof Körner; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-09-22

2.  Do object refixations during scene viewing indicate rehearsal in visual working memory?

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky; Lester C Loschky; Christopher A Dickinson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-05

Review 3.  Guidance of visual search by memory and knowledge.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Nebr Symp Motiv       Date:  2012

4.  The interplay of episodic and semantic memory in guiding repeated search in scenes.

Authors:  Melissa L-H Võ; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-11-21

5.  Seek and you shall remember: scene semantics interact with visual search to build better memories.

Authors:  Dejan Draschkow; Jeremy M Wolfe; Melissa L H Võ
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  When does repeated search in scenes involve memory? Looking at versus looking for objects in scenes.

Authors:  Melissa L-H Võ; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Learning in repeated visual search.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Task specificity and the influence of memory on visual search: comment on Võ and Wolfe (2012).

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Target probability modulates fixation-related potentials in visual search.

Authors:  Hannah Hiebel; Anja Ischebeck; Clemens Brunner; Andrey R Nikolaev; Margit Höfler; Christof Körner
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2018-09-22       Impact factor: 3.251

10.  Fixation duration surpasses pupil size as a measure of memory load in free viewing.

Authors:  Radha Nila Meghanathan; Cees van Leeuwen; Andrey R Nikolaev
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.