Literature DB >> 25015385

Seek and you shall remember: scene semantics interact with visual search to build better memories.

Dejan Draschkow1, Jeremy M Wolfe2, Melissa L H Võ3.   

Abstract

Memorizing critical objects and their locations is an essential part of everyday life. In the present study, incidental encoding of objects in naturalistic scenes during search was compared to explicit memorization of those scenes. To investigate if prior knowledge of scene structure influences these two types of encoding differently, we used meaningless arrays of objects as well as objects in real-world, semantically meaningful images. Surprisingly, when participants were asked to recall scenes, their memory performance was markedly better for searched objects than for objects they had explicitly tried to memorize, even though participants in the search condition were not explicitly asked to memorize objects. This finding held true even when objects were observed for an equal amount of time in both conditions. Critically, the recall benefit for searched over memorized objects in scenes was eliminated when objects were presented on uniform, non-scene backgrounds rather than in a full scene context. Thus, scene semantics not only help us search for objects in naturalistic scenes, but appear to produce a representation that supports our memory for those objects beyond intentional memorization.
© 2014 ARVO.

Entities:  

Keywords:  eye movements; object memory; scene perception; scene search; scene semantics; task dependent representations

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25015385      PMCID: PMC4095720          DOI: 10.1167/14.8.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  39 in total

1.  Rethinking visual scene perception.

Authors:  Helene Intraub
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-05-06

2.  Visual search is guided by prospective and retrospective memory.

Authors:  Mathew S Peterson; Melissa R Beck; Miroslava Vomela
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-01

3.  The role of memory and restricted context in repeated visual search.

Authors:  Melina A Kunar; Stephen Flusberg; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-02

4.  Incidental learning speeds visual search by lowering response thresholds, not by improving efficiency: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Michael C Hout; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Effects of perceiving and imagining scenes on memory for pictures.

Authors:  H Intraub; C V Gottesman; A J Bills
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 6.  Eye guidance in natural vision: reinterpreting salience.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler; Mary M Hayhoe; Michael F Land; Dana H Ballard
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  The strategic retention of task-relevant objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  Ashleigh M Maxcey-Richard; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Talia Konkle; George A Alvarez; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Task specificity and the influence of memory on visual search: comment on Võ and Wolfe (2012).

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Constructing visual representations of natural scenes: the roles of short- and long-term visual memory.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  21 in total

1.  Relating Visual Production and Recognition of Objects in Human Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Judith E Fan; Jeffrey D Wammes; Jordan B Gunn; Daniel L K Yamins; Kenneth A Norman; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Scene grammar shapes the way we interact with objects, strengthens memories, and speeds search.

Authors:  Dejan Draschkow; Melissa L-H Võ
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Gist in time: Scene semantics and structure enhance recall of searched objects.

Authors:  Emilie L Josephs; Dejan Draschkow; Jeremy M Wolfe; Melissa L-H Võ
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2016-06-03

Review 4.  The role of memory for visual search in scenes.

Authors:  Melissa Le-Hoa Võ; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 5.  Making Sense of Real-World Scenes.

Authors:  George L Malcolm; Iris I A Groen; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Incidental memory following rapid object processing: The role of attention allocation strategies.

Authors:  Juan D Guevara Pinto; Megan H Papesh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The Linguistic Analysis of Scene Semantics: LASS.

Authors:  Dylan Rose; Peter Bex
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-12

8.  Disrupted object-scene semantics boost scene recall but diminish object recall in drawings from memory.

Authors:  Wilma A Bainbridge; Wan Y Kwok; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-05-24

9.  Greater discrimination difficulty during perceptual learning leads to stronger and more distinct representations.

Authors:  Vencislav Popov; Lynne M Reder
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-08

10.  Competition between Visual Events Modulates the Influence of Salience during Free-Viewing of Naturalistic Videos.

Authors:  Davide Nardo; Paola Console; Carlo Reverberi; Emiliano Macaluso
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.