Literature DB >> 11334182

On the manifestations of memory in visual search.

D I Shore1, R M Klein.   

Abstract

Evidence is presented supporting the thesis that performance in visual search tasks is affected by the contribution of memory processes. Three levels of analysis, corresponding to the various time scales present in a typical search experiment, are discussed. Perceptual learning involves the task and stimulus specific improvement seen across blocks of training. Trial-to-trial priming has an influence which extends over 5-8 trials and lasts on the order of 30 s. Within-trial tagging prevents the re-inspection of already attended (or fixated) items. Also at the within-trial level of analysis, parallel accumulation of evidence for target presence/absence or target location inherently involves memory mechanisms. Organizing the various phenomena in this way makes it apparent that the various mechanisms may interact in a causal way. Within-trial tagging may contribute to priming which may contribute to perceptual learning. Recent proposals that visual search is memoryless (amnesic) are discussed and dismissed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11334182     DOI: 10.1163/156856801741369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spat Vis        ISSN: 0169-1015


  29 in total

1.  A body-centred frame of reference drives spatial priming in visual search.

Authors:  Keira Ball; Daniel Smith; Amanda Ellison; Thomas Schenk
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Marking rejected distractors: a gaze-contingent technique for measuring memory during search.

Authors:  Christopher A Dickinson; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-12

3.  Memory processes in multiple-target visual search.

Authors:  Christof Körner; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-09-22

4.  What are the shapes of response time distributions in visual search?

Authors:  Evan M Palmer; Todd S Horowitz; Antonio Torralba; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Finding a new target in an old display: evidence for a memory recency effect in visual search.

Authors:  Christof Körner; Iain D Gilchrist
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

6.  Memory for the search path: evidence for a high-capacity representation of search history.

Authors:  Christopher A Dickinson; Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Distinct, but top-down modulable color and positional priming mechanisms in visual pop-out search.

Authors:  Thomas Geyer; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-12-10

Review 8.  Reconceptualizing inhibition of return as habituation of the orienting response.

Authors:  Kristie R Dukewich
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

9.  No need for inhibitory tagging of locations in visual search.

Authors:  Johan Hulleman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

10.  Prioritizing new over old: an fMRI study of the preview search task.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers; Stephen Smith; Paul Matthews; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.