Literature DB >> 16811784

An appraisal of preference for multiple versus mixed schedules.

S R Hursh, E Fantino.   

Abstract

Pigeons' choice responses on either of two keys occasionally produced entry into a terminal link associated with that key. During the terminal links, responses produced access to grain according to mixed- or multiple-interval schedules. The multiple schedules provided stimuli correlated with the interval of time preceding reinforcement whereas the mixed schedules did not. The two subjects reliably preferred the multiple schedules to the mixed schedules throughout a series of replications. Preference for the multiple schedule was much smaller than suggested by earlier work comparing multiple and mixed schedules that had much higher rates of entry into the terminal links. Preference for the multiple schedule was greatly increased in this study when the rate of entry into the terminal schedules was increased. As in previous studies, these high preferences may have been the result of a sharp increase in the number of reinforcements on the multiple (as opposed to the mixed) schedule. The reliable but smaller preferences for the multiple schedule found with lower rates of entry into the terminal links were unconfounded by differences in the number of reinforcements obtained in the two terminal links.

Year:  1974        PMID: 16811784      PMCID: PMC1333238          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  15 in total

1.  Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The acquisition of observing responses in the absence of differential external reinforcement.

Authors:  W F PROKASY
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1956-04

3.  The role of observing responses in discrimination learning.

Authors:  L B WYCKOFF
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1952-11       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  The effect of shock intensity on concurrent and single-key responding in concurrent-chain schedules.

Authors:  H Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Preference for mixed- versus fixed-ratio schedules.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Relative delay of reinforcement and choice.

Authors:  S R Hursh; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Intracranial reinforcement in pigeons: an analysis using concurrent schedules.

Authors:  A H Davis; M C Davison; D M Webster
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1972-09

8.  On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference.

Authors:  P Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Effects of reinforcement magnitude on choice and rate of responding.

Authors:  A J Neuringer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Value of knowing when reinforcement is due.

Authors:  G Bower; J McLean; J Meacham
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1966-10
View more
  8 in total

1.  Dual effects on choice of conditioned reinforcement frequency and conditioned reinforcement value.

Authors:  Margaret A McDevitt; Ben A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Signalled and unsignalled percentage reinforcement of performance under a chained schedule.

Authors:  M N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Freedom and knowledge: an experimental analysis of preference in pigeons.

Authors:  A C Catania
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Incentive theory: II. Models for choice.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Uncertainty reduction, conditioned reinforcement, and observing.

Authors:  E Fantino; J Moore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Preference for multiple versus mixed schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  B Alsop; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Choice with uncertain outcomes: conditioned reinforcement effects.

Authors:  R Dunn; M L Spetch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 8.  Suboptimal choice by pigeons: an analog of human gambling behavior.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 1.777

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.