Literature DB >> 16811674

Relative delay of reinforcement and choice.

S R Hursh, E Fantino.   

Abstract

Pigeons' responses on either of two concurrently available keys each associated with variable-interval 60-sec schedules occasionally changed the schedule on that key to a terminal-link interval schedule providing access to gain while the other key became inoperative. Experiment I compared simple fixed- and mixed-interval schedules in the terminal links, and showed that for all subjects and schedules the distribution of responses during the concurrent initial links was accurately described by the relative inverse delay of reinforcement squared. Experiment II extended the generality of this formulation to a situation in which rate of reinforcement was constant and delay alone was varied.

Year:  1973        PMID: 16811674      PMCID: PMC1334139          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  14 in total

1.  Concurrent performances: reinforcement interaction and response independence.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Relativity of response rate and reinforcement frequency in a multiple schedule.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-04       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Sustained behavior under delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  C B FERSTER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-04

4.  Preference for mixed-interval versus fixed-interval schedules: number of component intervals.

Authors:  M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice for periodic schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  B Duncan; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Preference for mixed- versus fixed-ratio schedules.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Choice and delay of reinforcement.

Authors:  S H Chung; R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Preference for mixed-interval versus fixed-interval schedules.

Authors:  M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  A C Catania; G S Reynolds
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference.

Authors:  P Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  35 in total

1.  Comparing preference and resistance to change in constant- and variable-duration schedule components.

Authors:  R C Grace; J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The effect of rate of reinforcement and time in session on preference for variability.

Authors:  Frances K McSweeney; Benjamin P Kowal; Eric S Murphy
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  The maximization of overall reinforcement rate on concurrent chains.

Authors:  A I Houston; B H Sumida; J M McNamara
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Resistance to change produced by access to fixed-delay versus variable-delay terminal links.

Authors:  R C Mellon; R L Shull
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  An appraisal of preference for multiple versus mixed schedules.

Authors:  S R Hursh; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Preference for fixed-interval terminal links in a three-key concurrent chain schedule.

Authors:  M C Davison; W Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The delay-reduction hypothesis of conditioned reinforcement and punishment: Observing behavior.

Authors:  D A Case; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Response strength in multiple periodic and aperiodic schedules.

Authors:  C Mandell
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Incentive theory: II. Models for choice.

Authors:  P R Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  The effects of delayed reinforcement on free-operant responding.

Authors:  J L Weil
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.