Literature DB >> 6050053

Effects of reinforcement magnitude on choice and rate of responding.

A J Neuringer.   

Abstract

Behavior is sometimes insensitive, and sometimes extremely sensitive, to changes in reinforcement magnitude. The present work attempted to analyze this disparity by comparing, in a single experimental situation, a pigeon's choices with its response rates. Whereas choices varied directly with reinforcement duration, rates of responding were comparatively insensitive to duration changes. These results suggest that the effect of reinforcement magnitude on responding partly depends upon the extent to which responding influences the amount of reinforcement.

Mesh:

Year:  1967        PMID: 6050053      PMCID: PMC1338405          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  17 in total

1.  SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  T-MAZE CHOICE LEARNING AS A JOINT FUNCTION OF THE REWARD MAGNITUDES FOR THE ALTERNATIVES.

Authors:  K N CLAYTON
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1964-12

3.  RELATIVE RATE OF RESPONSE AND RELATIVE MAGNITUDE OF REINFORCEMENT IN MULTIPLE SCHEDULES.

Authors:  S SHETTLEWORTH; J A NEVIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The effect of correlated amount of reward on performance on a fixed-interval schedule of reinforcement.

Authors:  D P HENDRY
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1962-06

5.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Comparison of two methods of investigating the effect of amount of reward on performance.

Authors:  A M SCHRIER
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1958-12

7.  The relationship between training methods and reward variables in brightness discrimination learning.

Authors:  R K MCKELVEY
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1956-10

8.  Differential response learning on the basis of differential size of reward.

Authors:  M R DENNY; G F KING
Journal:  J Genet Psychol       Date:  1955-12       Impact factor: 1.509

9.  The effect of magnitude of reward on maze learning in the white rat.

Authors:  E FURCHTGOTT; R D RUBIN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1953-02

10.  The effect of shock intensity on concurrent and single-key responding in concurrent-chain schedules.

Authors:  H Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  72 in total

1.  Three predictions of the economic concept of unit price in a choice context.

Authors:  G J Madden; W K Bickel; E A Jacobs
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The principal components of response strength.

Authors:  P R Killeen; S S Hall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Pigeon Lab notable experience.

Authors:  N H Azrin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The matching law illustrates the influence of the Harvard Pigeon Lab.

Authors:  Frances K McSweeney
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Context matters: my education at the Harvard Pigeon Lab.

Authors:  Terry W Belke
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Qualitatively different reinforcers in the Harvard Pigeon Lab.

Authors:  Harold L Miller
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Observing behavior: effects of rate and magnitude of primary reinforcement.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Unit price and choice in a token-reinforcement context.

Authors:  Theresa A Foster; Timothy D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Why pigeons say what they do: reinforcer magnitude and response requirement effects on say responding in say-do correspondence.

Authors:  Stephanie P da Silva; Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  The economics of the law of effect.

Authors:  G H Collier; D F Johnson; W L Hill; L W Kaufman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.