Literature DB >> 16811310

The effect of shock intensity on concurrent and single-key responding in concurrent-chain schedules.

H Rachlin.   

Abstract

Pigeons were trained to respond in a two-link, concurrent-chain schedule. Pecks on each key during the concurrent initial links occasionally produced a 5-min terminal link, during which only that key was operative. Food reinforcement and various intensities of shock were scheduled during the terminal links. When shock was contingent on response, the effect of shock was greater on terminal-link responding than on initial-link responding. When shock was independent of response, the effect was reversed, with larger changes in initial-link responding than terminal-link responding. In general, shock was found to affect behavior most drastically when behavior could, in turn, affect the rate of shock.

Year:  1967        PMID: 16811310      PMCID: PMC1338322          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-87

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  5 in total

1.  Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  EFFECTS OF EFFORT ON RESPONSE RATE.

Authors:  S H CHUNG
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  A technique for delivering shock to pigeons.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-04       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Potency of Conditioned Reinforcers Based on Food and on Food and Punishment.

Authors:  G S Reynolds
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-03-01       Impact factor: 47.728

  5 in total
  13 in total

1.  The Harvard Pigeon Lab under Herrnstein.

Authors:  William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Punishment contras during free-operant avoidance.

Authors:  K A Lattal; M A Griffin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  An appraisal of preference for multiple versus mixed schedules.

Authors:  S R Hursh; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice for signalled over unsignalled shock as a function of shock intensity.

Authors:  J Harsh; P Badia
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice and rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  A molar theory of reinforcement schedules.

Authors:  H Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Indifference between punishment and free shock: evidence for the negative law of effect.

Authors:  R Schuster; H Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The symmetrical law of effect and the matching relation in choice behavior.

Authors:  J Farley; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Schedules using noxious stimuli. III. Responding maintained with response-produced electric shocks.

Authors:  R T Kelleher; W H Morse
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Effects of required rates of responding upon choice.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.