Literature DB >> 5660707

On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference.

P Killeen.   

Abstract

In a two-link, concurrent-chain schedule, pigeons' pecks on each key during the initial link occasionally produced a terminal link, during which only that key was operative. Responses in the terminal link were reinforced with food on either fixed-interval or variable-interval schedules. In one experiment, relative amount of responding in the initial link equaled the relative harmonic rate of reinforcement in the terminal links. In a second experiment, the selection of interreinforcement intervals in variable-interval schedules in the terminal links was such that rates of reinforcement based on the harmonic or on the arithmetic means of the interreinforcement intervals predicted opposite preferences in the initial links. The observed preference was consistent with that predicted by the harmonic rather than by the arithmetic rates of reinforcement.

Mesh:

Year:  1968        PMID: 5660707      PMCID: PMC1338484          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  5 in total

1.  Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude.

Authors:  A C CATANIA
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  On the averaging of data.

Authors:  S S STEVENS
Journal:  Science       Date:  1955-01-28       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Preference for mixed- versus fixed-ratio schedules.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice and delay of reinforcement.

Authors:  S H Chung; R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Some time-correlated reinforcement schedules and their effects on behavior.

Authors:  R Clark
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  5 in total
  84 in total

1.  Comparing preference and resistance to change in constant- and variable-duration schedule components.

Authors:  R C Grace; J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Changing behavior within session: cyclicity and perseverance produced by varying the minimum ratio of a variable-ratio schedule.

Authors:  M E Andrzejewski; D P Field; P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  Operant conditioning.

Authors:  J E R Staddon; D T Cerutti
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002-06-10       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  The effect of rate of reinforcement and time in session on preference for variability.

Authors:  Frances K McSweeney; Benjamin P Kowal; Eric S Murphy
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  The Harvard Pigeon Lab under Herrnstein.

Authors:  William M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Immediacy versus anticipated delay in the time-left experiment: a test of the cognitive hypothesis.

Authors:  D T Cerutti; J E R Staddon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2004-01

7.  Temporal context in concurrent chains: I. Terminal-link duration.

Authors:  Randolph C Grace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Choice in situations of time-based diminishing returns: immediate versus delayed consequences of action.

Authors:  T D Hackenberg; P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Matching: its acquisition and generalization.

Authors:  Michael A Crowley; John W Donahoe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Conditioned reinforcement: Experimental and theoretical issues.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1994
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.