Literature DB >> 16812442

Preference for multiple versus mixed schedules of reinforcement.

B Alsop, M Davison.   

Abstract

Five pigeons were trained in a concurrent-chain procedure. In the initial links, equal nonindependent variable-interval schedules were available concurrently on two keys. Completing the schedule on either key led to exclusive presentation of one of two further variable-interval schedules for a fixed period of time. During these terminal links, as many reinforcers as were scheduled could be obtained. If the response producing this terminal link occurred on one key, differential stimuli signaled which variable-interval schedule had been produced. If the response producing the terminal link occurred on the other key, no such differential stimuli were available. Once the fixed period of time elapsed, the initial links were reinstated. In Experiment 1, the period of time for which the terminal links were available was always 10 s and the absolute duration of the initial links was varied. Subjects preferred the alternative leading to the multiple schedule when the initial-link duration was short, but preferred the alternative leading to the mixed schedule when the initial-link durations were longer. In Experiment 2, both the initial-link duration and the duration of the terminal links were varied. The effect of initial-link duration was identical to that in Experiment 1 and there was no systematic effect of varying the terminal-link duration.

Year:  1986        PMID: 16812442      PMCID: PMC1348209          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  9 in total

1.  Bias and sensitivity to reinforcement in a concurrent-chain schedule.

Authors:  M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Concurrent responding with fixed relative rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  D A Stubbs; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Choice: Some quantitative relations.

Authors:  E Fantino; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  An appraisal of preference for multiple versus mixed schedules.

Authors:  S R Hursh; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Observing responses in pigeons: effects of schedule component duration and schedule value.

Authors:  M N Branch
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Uncertainty reduction, conditioned reinforcement, and observing.

Authors:  E Fantino; J Moore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Choice and rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Average uncertainty as a determinant of observing behavior.

Authors:  J C McMillan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Pigeons' preferences for stimulus information: effects of amount of information.

Authors:  L Green; H Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.468

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.

Authors:  A P McLean; N M Blampied
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Comparing preference and resistance to change in constant- and variable-duration schedule components.

Authors:  R C Grace; J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A long-term study of the impulsive choices of Lewis and Fischer 344 rats.

Authors:  Carlos F Aparicio; Mirari Elcoro; Benigno Alonso-Alvarez
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Rapid determinations of preference in multiple concurrent-chain schedules.

Authors:  D T Cerutti; A C Catania
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Pigeons' delay discounting functions established using a concurrent-chains procedure.

Authors:  Luís Oliveira; Leonard Green; Joel Myerson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Forced-exposure trials increase suboptimal choice.

Authors:  Margaret A McDevitt; Jeffrey M Pisklak; Roger M Dunn; Marcia L Spetch
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-04-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.