Literature DB >> 16811982

Signalled and unsignalled percentage reinforcement of performance under a chained schedule.

M N Branch.   

Abstract

Pigeons were trained to peck a key under a chained fixed-ratio 15 fixed-interval 25-sec schedule of food presentation. In Experiment 1, blocks of sessions in which 100%, 75%, 50%, and 25% of the sequences ended with food presentation were conducted. When food presentation was omitted, a timeout of equal duration replaced it. As the frequency of food presentation decreased so did the frequency of completing the chained schedule. In Experiment 2, 75%, 50%, or 25% of the sequences terminated with food presentation and outcomes were signalled, i.e., completion of the fixed ratio resulted in either a stimulus correlated with the fixed-interval 25-sec schedule or a stimulus correlated with extinction. As the frequency of food presentation decreased, the number of sequences completed per session increased for two pigeons and remained high for a third. In Experiments 3 and 4, assessments of the effects of signalling the outcome of the chained schedule were made with response-independent presentation of events at the end of the sequence. Again, signalling the outcome of the chained schedule led to more chains being completed per session than did not signalling the outcome. Stimuli differentially paired with food presentation have powerful behavioral effects that may be attributed to the potency of these stimuli as conditioned reinforcers.

Year:  1977        PMID: 16811982      PMCID: PMC1333553          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-71

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  28 in total

1.  Fixed-interval behavior: effects of percentage reinforcement.

Authors:  M D Zeiler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  A yoked-chamber comparison of concurrent and multiple schedules.

Authors:  P Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Matching to relative reinforcement frequency in multiple schedules with a short component duration.

Authors:  C P Shimp; K L Wheatley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Rate changes after unscheduled omission and presentation of reinforcement.

Authors:  D W Zimmerman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Percentage reinforcement of fixed-ratio and variable-interval performances.

Authors:  J C McMillan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The role of information in the emission of observing responses: a test of two hypotheses.

Authors:  R N Wilton; R O Clements
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Component duration and relative response rates in multiple schedules.

Authors:  J C Todorov
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Quasi-reinforcement: control of responding by a percentage-reinforcement schedule.

Authors:  A J Neuringer; S H Chung
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Responding under chained and tandem fixed-ratio schedules.

Authors:  A R Jwaideh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Reinforcement omission on fixed-interval schedules.

Authors:  J E Staddon; N K Innis
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  4 in total

1.  Preference for signaled versus unsignaled reinforcement delay in concurrent-chain schedules.

Authors:  A J Marcattilio; R W Richards
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Conditioned reinforcement: Neglected or outmoded explanatory construct?

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

3.  Timeout from concurrent schedules.

Authors:  R Dunn
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Suboptimal choice in a percentage-reinforcement procedure: effects of signal condition and terminal-link length.

Authors:  M L Spetch; T W Belke; R C Barnet; R Dunn; W D Pierce
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.468

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.