Literature DB >> 16810335

Male rats show an indifference-avoidance response for increasing concentrations of the artificial sweetener sucralose.

Nicholas T Bello1, Andras Hajnal.   

Abstract

Sucralose is a non-nutritive halogenated sucrose derivative that has been described by humans as tasting predominately sweet with little or no aftertaste. In this study we examined the preference for sucralose in adult male Sprague Dawley rats. A standard 24 hr two-bottle test was used to compare a wide range of sucralose concentrations (0.0003-10g/L; 0.8 μM-25 mM) with water. The rats did not prefer sucralose to water at low concentrations (0.0003-0.3 g/L) and avoided sucralose at high concentrations (1-10g/L). Although there are many similarities in the taste preference of humans, mice, and rats, these results suggest that male rats do not prefer sucralose and avoid it at high concentrations. An awareness of the potential species differences in preference testing for novel sweeteners is critical for the taste and nutritional research communities.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 16810335      PMCID: PMC1483904          DOI: 10.1016/j.nutres.2005.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Res        ISSN: 0271-5317            Impact factor:   3.315


  14 in total

1.  Lack of effect of sucralose on glucose homeostasis in subjects with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  V Lee Grotz; Robert R Henry; Janet B McGill; Melvin J Prince; Harry Shamoon; J Richard Trout; F Xavier Pi-Sunyer
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2003-12

2.  Detection of sweet and umami taste in the absence of taste receptor T1r3.

Authors:  Sami Damak; Minqing Rong; Keiko Yasumatsu; Zaza Kokrashvili; Vijaya Varadarajan; Shiying Zou; Peihua Jiang; Yuzo Ninomiya; Robert F Margolskee
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Glycemic effect of a single high oral dose of the novel sweetener sucralose in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  N H Mezitis; C A Maggio; P Koch; A Quddoos; D B Allison; F X Pi-Sunyer
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Dulcin and saccharin taste in squirrel monkeys, rats, and men.

Authors:  G L Fisher; C Pfaffmann; E Brown
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-10-22       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Whole nerve chorda tympani responses to sweeteners in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  M Inoue; S A McCaughey; A A Bachmanov; G K Beauchamp
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Sweetener preference of C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  A A Bachmanov; M G Tordoff; G K Beauchamp
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  Bitterness of sweeteners as a function of concentration.

Authors:  S S Schiffman; B J Booth; M L Losee; S D Pecore; Z S Warwick
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.077

8.  Sex differences in taste preference for glucose and saccharin solutions.

Authors:  E S Valenstein; J W Kakolewski; V C Cox
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-05-19       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Sucralose metabolism and pharmacokinetics in man.

Authors:  A Roberts; A G Renwick; J Sims; D J Snodin
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 6.023

10.  Female rats show a bimodal preference response to the artificial sweetener sucralose.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Richard A Clare
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.160

View more
  15 in total

1.  Preference for sucralose predicts behavioral responses to sweet and bittersweet tastants.

Authors:  Gregory C Loney; Ann-Marie Torregrossa; Chris Carballo; Lisa A Eckel
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Taste solution consumption by FHH-Chr nBN consomic rats.

Authors:  Michael G Tordoff
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Flavor preferences conditioned by nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners in mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-02-10

4.  Advantame sweetener preference in C57BL/6J mice and Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Rapid stimulus-bound suppression of intake in response to an intraduodenal nonnutritive sweetener after training with nutritive sugars predicting malaise.

Authors:  Lindsey A Schier; Terry L Davidson; Terry L Powley
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.619

6.  Rats display a robust bimodal preference profile for sucralose.

Authors:  Gregory C Loney; Ann-Marie Torregrossa; James C Smith; Anthony Sclafani; Lisa A Eckel
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 7.  Non-nutritive sweeteners, energy balance, and glucose homeostasis.

Authors:  Marta Y Pepino; Christina Bourne
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.294

8.  Postoral glucose sensing, not caloric content, determines sugar reward in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Steven Zukerman; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  Stevia and saccharin preferences in rats and mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Mahsa Bahrani; Steven Zukerman; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 3.160

10.  Examination of the perception of sweet- and bitter-like taste qualities in sucralose preferring and avoiding rats.

Authors:  A-M Torregrossa; G C Loney; J C Smith; L A Eckel
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.