Literature DB >> 25497078

Examination of the perception of sweet- and bitter-like taste qualities in sucralose preferring and avoiding rats.

A-M Torregrossa1, G C Loney2, J C Smith2, L A Eckel2.   

Abstract

Sucralose avoiding rats detect a bitter-like taste quality in concentrations of sucralose that are strongly preferred over water by sucralose preferring rats. Here, we investigated whether sucralose preferrers (SP) also detect a bitter-like quality in sucralose that may be masked by an increased perception of sucralose's sweet-like quality. A microstructural analysis of sucralose intake revealed that, at concentrations they avoided in preference tests, sucralose avoiders (SA) consumed smaller and fewer bouts of sucralose than SP. Interestingly, the concentration-dependent increase in sucralose preference in SP was not associated with larger bouts or increased lick rate, two measures that are expected to increase with increasing perceived sweetness. This suggests that SP can detect an aversive quality in sucralose, but this perception of a presumably bitter-like quality may be masked by increased salience of a sweet-like quality that sustains high levels of intake in SP. Further evidence for increased sweet-taste perception in SP, relative to SA, was obtained in a second study in which SP consumed more of a palatable sweet-milk diet than SA. These are the first data to suggest that SP are not blind to the bitter-like quality in sucralose, and that there may be differences in sweet-taste perception between SP and SA.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial sweetener; Individual differences; Rats; Taste

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25497078      PMCID: PMC4324336          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.12.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  36 in total

1.  The relationship between phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) and 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) taster status and taste thresholds for sucrose and quinine.

Authors:  Won-Ic Chang; Jin-Woo Chung; Young-Ku Kim; Sung-Chang Chung; Hong-Seop Kho
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 2.633

2.  Genomic, genetic and functional dissection of bitter taste responses to artificial sweeteners.

Authors:  Natacha Roudnitzky; Bernd Bufe; Sophie Thalmann; Christina Kuhn; Howard C Gunn; Chao Xing; Bill P Crider; Maik Behrens; Wolfgang Meyerhof; Stephen P Wooding
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  Bitterness of sweeteners as a function of concentration.

Authors:  S S Schiffman; B J Booth; M L Losee; S D Pecore; Z S Warwick
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  Greater energy intake from a buffet meal in lean, young women is associated with the 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) non-taster phenotype.

Authors:  Beverly J Tepper; Meredith Neilland; Natalia V Ullrich; Yvonne Koelliker; Lisa M Belzer
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 3.868

5.  Responses to repeated oral irritation by capsaicin, cinnamaldehyde and ethanol in PROP tasters and non-tasters.

Authors:  J Prescott; N Swain-Campbell
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil is associated with gustin (carbonic anhydrase VI) gene polymorphism, salivary zinc, and body mass index in humans.

Authors:  Alessandra Padiglia; Andrea Zonza; Elena Atzori; Caterina Chillotti; Carla Calò; Beverly J Tepper; Iole Tomassini Barbarossa
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  Diet-induced hyperphagia in the rat is influenced by sex and exercise.

Authors:  Lisa A Eckel; Shelley R Moore
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 3.619

8.  Sucrose motivation in sweet "sensitive" (C57BL/6J) and "subsensitive" (129P3/J) mice measured by progressive ratio licking.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2006-03-10

9.  Psychophysical measurement of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) taste perception.

Authors:  L A Lucchina; O F Curtis; P Putnam; A Drewnowski; J M Prutkin; L M Bartoshuk
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1998-11-30       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Female rats show a bimodal preference response to the artificial sweetener sucralose.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Richard A Clare
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.160

View more
  5 in total

1.  Residual Glucose Taste in T1R3 Knockout but not TRPM5 Knockout Mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Steven Zukerman; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2020-05-15

Review 2.  Sucralose and Cardiometabolic Health: Current Understanding from Receptors to Clinical Investigations.

Authors:  Sydney Risdon; Sylvain Battault; Alonso Romo-Romo; Matthieu Roustit; Loic Briand; Grégory Meyer; Paloma Almeda-Valdes; Guillaume Walther
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 8.701

3.  Chronic Intake of Commercial Sweeteners Induces Changes in Feeding Behavior and Signaling Pathways Related to the Control of Appetite in BALB/c Mice.

Authors:  Alberto A Barrios-Correa; José A Estrada; Caroline Martel; Martin Olivier; Rubén López-Santiago; Irazú Contreras
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-01-28       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Stability of individual differences in sucralose taste preference.

Authors:  Sam Z Bacharach; Donna J Calu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Sweetener-Sensing Mechanisms of the Ghrelin Cell.

Authors:  Sandra Steensels; Laurien Vancleef; Inge Depoortere
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 5.717

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.