Literature DB >> 21653913

Rats display a robust bimodal preference profile for sucralose.

Gregory C Loney1, Ann-Marie Torregrossa, James C Smith, Anthony Sclafani, Lisa A Eckel.   

Abstract

Female Sprague-Dawley rats display considerable variability in their preference for the artificial sweetener sucralose over water. While some rats can be classified as sucralose preferrers (SP), as they prefer sucralose across a broad range of concentrations, others can be classified as sucralose avoiders (SA), as they avoid sucralose at concentrations above 0.1 g/L. Here, we expand on a previous report of this phenomenon by demonstrating, in a series of 2-bottle 24-h preference tests involving water and an ascending series of sucralose concentrations, that this variability in sucralose preference is robust across sex, stage of the estrous cycle, and 2 rat strains (Long-Evans and Sprague-Dawley). In a second experiment involving a large sample of rats (n = 50), we established that the ratio of SP to SA is approximately 35-65%. This bimodal behavioral response to sucralose appears to be driven by taste because rats display a similar bimodal licking response to a range of sucralose solutions presented during brief-access tests. Finally, we have shown that sucralose avoidance is extremely robust as 23-h water-deprived SA continue to avoid sucralose in 1-h single-bottle intake tests. Based on their reduced licking responses to sucralose during brief-access (taste driven) tests, and the fact that their distaste for sucralose cannot be overcome by the motivation to rehydrate, we conclude that SA detect a negative taste quality of sucralose that SP are relatively insensitive to.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21653913      PMCID: PMC3175105          DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjr048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  45 in total

1.  Some properties of saccharin as a reinforcer.

Authors:  G COLLIER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1962-08

Review 2.  Strategies and methods for research on sex differences in brain and behavior.

Authors:  Jill B Becker; Arthur P Arnold; Karen J Berkley; Jeffrey D Blaustein; Lisa A Eckel; Elizabeth Hampson; James P Herman; Sherry Marts; Wolfgang Sadee; Meir Steiner; Jane Taylor; Elizabeth Young
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.736

3.  The relationship between phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) and 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) taster status and taste thresholds for sucrose and quinine.

Authors:  Won-Ic Chang; Jin-Woo Chung; Young-Ku Kim; Sung-Chang Chung; Hong-Seop Kho
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 2.633

4.  Hormonal and developmental influences on rat saccharin preferences.

Authors:  G N Wade; I Zucker
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1969-10

5.  Bitterness of sweeteners as a function of concentration.

Authors:  S S Schiffman; B J Booth; M L Losee; S D Pecore; Z S Warwick
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  Phenotypic characterization of taste cells of the mouse small intestine.

Authors:  Kate Sutherland; Richard L Young; Nicole J Cooper; Michael Horowitz; L Ashley Blackshaw
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 4.052

7.  Sweet taste receptors in rat small intestine stimulate glucose absorption through apical GLUT2.

Authors:  Oliver J Mace; Julie Affleck; Nick Patel; George L Kellett
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Role of CCK1 and Y2 receptors in activation of hindbrain neurons induced by intragastric administration of bitter taste receptor ligands.

Authors:  Shuzhen Hao; Catia Sternini; Helen E Raybould
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 3.619

9.  Inherited taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil in diet and body weight in children.

Authors:  Kathleen L Keller; Beverly J Tepper
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2004-06

10.  Female rats show a bimodal preference response to the artificial sweetener sucralose.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Richard A Clare
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.160

View more
  14 in total

1.  Preference for sucralose predicts behavioral responses to sweet and bittersweet tastants.

Authors:  Gregory C Loney; Ann-Marie Torregrossa; Chris Carballo; Lisa A Eckel
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Advantame sweetener preference in C57BL/6J mice and Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Rapid stimulus-bound suppression of intake in response to an intraduodenal nonnutritive sweetener after training with nutritive sugars predicting malaise.

Authors:  Lindsey A Schier; Terry L Davidson; Terry L Powley
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.619

4.  Determinants of taste preference and acceptability: quality versus hedonics.

Authors:  Gregory C Loney; Ginger D Blonde; Lisa A Eckel; Alan C Spector
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Bisphenol-A exposure during adolescence leads to enduring alterations in cognition and dendritic spine density in adult male and female rats.

Authors:  Rachel E Bowman; Victoria Luine; Samantha Diaz Weinstein; Hameda Khandaker; Sarah DeWolf; Maya Frankfurt
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 3.587

6.  Rats are unable to discriminate quinine from diverse bitter stimuli.

Authors:  Laura E Martin; Kristen E Kay; Ann-Marie Torregrossa
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.619

7.  Postoral glucose sensing, not caloric content, determines sugar reward in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Steven Zukerman; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.160

8.  Examination of the perception of sweet- and bitter-like taste qualities in sucralose preferring and avoiding rats.

Authors:  A-M Torregrossa; G C Loney; J C Smith; L A Eckel
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-12-10

9.  Residual Glucose Taste in T1R3 Knockout but not TRPM5 Knockout Mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Steven Zukerman; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2020-05-15

10.  A high throughput in vivo assay for taste quality and palatability.

Authors:  R Kyle Palmer; Daniel Long; Francis Brennan; Tulu Buber; Robert Bryant; F Raymond Salemme
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.