Literature DB >> 11555485

Sweetener preference of C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

A A Bachmanov1, M G Tordoff, G K Beauchamp.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown large differences in taste responses to several sweeteners between mice of the C57BL/6ByJ (B6) and 129P3/J (129) inbred strains. The goal of this study was to compare behavioral responses of B6 and 129 mice to a wider variety of sweeteners. Seventeen sweeteners were tested using two-bottle preference tests with water. Three main patterns of strain differences were evident. First, sucrose, maltose, saccharin, acesulfame-K, sucralose and SC-45647 were preferred by both strains, but the B6 mice had lower preference thresholds and higher solution intakes. Second, the amino acids D-phenylalanine, D-tryptophan, L-proline and glycine were highly preferred by B6 mice, but not by 129 mice. Third, glycyrrhizic acid, neohesperidin dihydrochalcone, thaumatin and cyclamate did not evoke strong preferences in either strain. Aspartame was neutral to all 129 and some B6 mice, but other B6 mice strongly preferred it. Thus, compared with the 129 mice the B6 mice had higher preferences for sugars, sweet tasting amino acids and several but not all non-caloric sweeteners. Glycyrrhizic acid, neohesperidin, thaumatin and cyclamate are not palatable to B6 or 129 mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11555485      PMCID: PMC3718299          DOI: 10.1093/chemse/26.7.905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  32 in total

1.  Intake of umami-tasting solutions by mice: a genetic analysis.

Authors:  A A Bachmanov; M G Tordoff; G K Beauchamp
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Single-locus control of saccharin preference in mice.

Authors:  J L Fuller
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1974 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.645

3.  Whole nerve chorda tympani responses to sweeteners in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  M Inoue; S A McCaughey; A A Bachmanov; G K Beauchamp
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  High-resolution genetic mapping of the saccharin preference locus (Sac) and the putative sweet taste receptor (T1R1) gene (Gpr70) to mouse distal Chromosome 4.

Authors:  X Li; M Inoue; D R Reed; T Huque; R B Puchalski; M G Tordoff; Y Ninomiya; G K Beauchamp; A A Bachmanov
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.957

5.  Rats show only a weak preference for the artificial sweetener aspartame.

Authors:  A Sclafani; M Abrams
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1986

6.  Gustatory neural responses in three different strains of mice.

Authors:  Y Ninomiya; T Mizukoshi; T Higashi; H Katsukawa; M Funakoshi
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1984-06-08       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Taste responses to neohesperidin dihydrochalcone in rats and baboon monkeys.

Authors:  M Naim; H Rogatka; T Yamamoto; U Zehavi
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1982-06

8.  Qualitative discrimination of gustatory stimuli in three different strains of mice.

Authors:  Y Ninomiya; T Higashi; H Katsukawa; T Mizukoshi; M Funakoshi
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1984-11-19       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Stimulation of the gerbil's gustatory receptors by artificial sweeteners.

Authors:  W Jakinovich
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1981-04-06       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Preference for sugars and nonnutritive sweeteners in young beagles.

Authors:  F Ferrell
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 8.989

View more
  103 in total

1.  Transformation of postingestive glucose responses after deletion of sweet taste receptor subunits or gastric bypass surgery.

Authors:  Maartje C P Geraedts; Tatsuyuki Takahashi; Stephan Vigues; Michele L Markwardt; Andongfac Nkobena; Renee E Cockerham; Andras Hajnal; Cedrick D Dotson; Mark A Rizzo; Steven D Munger
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 4.310

2.  Gut T1R3 sweet taste receptors do not mediate sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Damien S Glass; Robert F Margolskee; John I Glendinning
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Perceptual and neural responses to sweet taste in humans and rodents.

Authors:  Christian H Lemon
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.833

4.  Genetic approach to characterize interaction of sweeteners with sweet taste receptors in vivo.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Oxytocin knockout mice demonstrate enhanced intake of sweet and nonsweet carbohydrate solutions.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Linda Rinaman; Regis R Vollmer; Janet A Amico
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 3.619

6.  Taste-evoked responses to sweeteners in the nucleus of the solitary tract differ between C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  Stuart A McCaughey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Amino acid and carbohydrate preferences in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-08-08

8.  No relationship between sequence variation in protein coding regions of the Tas1r3 gene and saccharin preference in rats.

Authors:  Ke Lu; Amanda H McDaniel; Michael G Tordoff; Xia Li; Gary K Beauchamp; Alexander A Bachmanov; Dennis A VanderWeele; Clinton D Chapman; Nancy K Dess; Liquan Huang; Hong Wang; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  Regulation of bitter taste responses by tumor necrosis factor.

Authors:  Pu Feng; Masafumi Jyotaki; Agnes Kim; Jinghua Chai; Nirvine Simon; Minliang Zhou; Alexander A Bachmanov; Liquan Huang; Hong Wang
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 7.217

10.  Maltodextrin and sucrose preferences in sweet-sensitive (C57BL/6J) and subsensitive (129P3/J) mice revisited.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-08-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.