Literature DB >> 15269124

Female rats show a bimodal preference response to the artificial sweetener sucralose.

Anthony Sclafani1, Richard A Clare.   

Abstract

The preference of female Sprague-Dawley rats for sucralose, a non-nutritive sweetener derived from sucrose, was evaluated in 23 h two-bottle tests with water or saccharin. Overall, the rats displayed weak or no preferences for sucralose (0.25-4 g/l) over water but strong preferences for saccharin (0.5-8 g/l) over water and saccharin (1 g/l) over sucralose (0.5 g/l). The rats also preferred a saccharin + sucrose mixture to sucrose, but sucrose to a sucralose + sucrose mixture. There were marked individual differences in sucralose preferences: about half the rats preferred sucralose to water at some concentrations while most remaining rats avoided sucralose. Both subgroups preferred saccharin to sucralose. Sucralose appears to have an aversive off-taste that reduces its palatability to rats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15269124     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjh055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  20 in total

1.  Perceptual and neural responses to sweet taste in humans and rodents.

Authors:  Christian H Lemon
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.833

2.  Preference for sucralose predicts behavioral responses to sweet and bittersweet tastants.

Authors:  Gregory C Loney; Ann-Marie Torregrossa; Chris Carballo; Lisa A Eckel
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Taste solution consumption by FHH-Chr nBN consomic rats.

Authors:  Michael G Tordoff
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Flavor preferences conditioned by nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners in mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-02-10

5.  Male rats show an indifference-avoidance response for increasing concentrations of the artificial sweetener sucralose.

Authors:  Nicholas T Bello; Andras Hajnal
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Advantame sweetener preference in C57BL/6J mice and Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 3.160

7.  Determinants of taste preference and acceptability: quality versus hedonics.

Authors:  Gregory C Loney; Ginger D Blonde; Lisa A Eckel; Alan C Spector
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Rats display a robust bimodal preference profile for sucralose.

Authors:  Gregory C Loney; Ann-Marie Torregrossa; James C Smith; Anthony Sclafani; Lisa A Eckel
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  No relationship between sequence variation in protein coding regions of the Tas1r3 gene and saccharin preference in rats.

Authors:  Ke Lu; Amanda H McDaniel; Michael G Tordoff; Xia Li; Gary K Beauchamp; Alexander A Bachmanov; Dennis A VanderWeele; Clinton D Chapman; Nancy K Dess; Liquan Huang; Hong Wang; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 3.160

10.  Examination of the perception of sweet- and bitter-like taste qualities in sucralose preferring and avoiding rats.

Authors:  A-M Torregrossa; G C Loney; J C Smith; L A Eckel
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.