Literature DB >> 22281530

Preference for sucralose predicts behavioral responses to sweet and bittersweet tastants.

Gregory C Loney1, Ann-Marie Torregrossa, Chris Carballo, Lisa A Eckel.   

Abstract

Rats can be classified as either sucralose avoiders (SA) or sucralose preferrers (SP) based on their behavioral responses in 2-bottle preference, 1-bottle intake, and brief-access licking tests. The present study demonstrates that this robust phenotypic variation in the preference for sucralose predicts acceptance of saccharin, an artificial sweetener with a purported concentration-dependent "bitter" side taste and a 0.25 M sucrose solution adulterated with increasing concentrations of quinine hydrochloride (QHCl). Specifically, SA displayed decreased preference for and intakes of saccharin (≥41.5 mM) and sucrose-QHCl (>0.5 mM QHCl) solutions, relative to SP. In a second experiment involving brief-access (30-s) tests, SP and SA did not differ in their unconditioned licking responses across a range of sodium chloride or QHCl solutions (0.03-1 mM). However, the acceptability threshold for sucrose was lower in SA, relative to SP (0.06 and 0.13 M, respectively). Our findings suggest that phenotypic differences in sucralose preference are indicative of a more general difference in the hedonic processing of stimuli containing "bittersweet" or "sweet" taste qualities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22281530      PMCID: PMC3348172          DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjr126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  41 in total

1.  The relationship between phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) and 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) taster status and taste thresholds for sucrose and quinine.

Authors:  Won-Ic Chang; Jin-Woo Chung; Young-Ku Kim; Sung-Chang Chung; Hong-Seop Kho
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 2.633

2.  Genomic, genetic and functional dissection of bitter taste responses to artificial sweeteners.

Authors:  Natacha Roudnitzky; Bernd Bufe; Sophie Thalmann; Christina Kuhn; Howard C Gunn; Chao Xing; Bill P Crider; Maik Behrens; Wolfgang Meyerhof; Stephen P Wooding
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  The effectiveness of some sugars in stimulating licking behavior in the rat.

Authors:  J D Davis
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1973-07

4.  Bitterness of sweeteners as a function of concentration.

Authors:  S S Schiffman; B J Booth; M L Losee; S D Pecore; Z S Warwick
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  Responses to repeated oral irritation by capsaicin, cinnamaldehyde and ethanol in PROP tasters and non-tasters.

Authors:  J Prescott; N Swain-Campbell
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Food acceptance and genetic variation in taste.

Authors:  V B Duffy; L M Bartoshuk
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2000-06

7.  Human hedonic responses to sweetness: role of taste genetics and anatomy.

Authors:  Martin R Yeomans; Beverly J Tepper; Julia Rietzschel; John Prescott
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-03-16

8.  Specific alleles of bitter receptor genes influence human sensitivity to the bitterness of aloin and saccharin.

Authors:  Alexey N Pronin; Hong Xu; Huixian Tang; Lan Zhang; Qing Li; Xiaodong Li
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Psychophysical measurement of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) taste perception.

Authors:  L A Lucchina; O F Curtis; P Putnam; A Drewnowski; J M Prutkin; L M Bartoshuk
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1998-11-30       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Female rats show a bimodal preference response to the artificial sweetener sucralose.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Richard A Clare
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.160

View more
  5 in total

1.  Examination of the perception of sweet- and bitter-like taste qualities in sucralose preferring and avoiding rats.

Authors:  A-M Torregrossa; G C Loney; J C Smith; L A Eckel
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-12-10

2.  A high throughput in vivo assay for taste quality and palatability.

Authors:  R Kyle Palmer; Daniel Long; Francis Brennan; Tulu Buber; Robert Bryant; F Raymond Salemme
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Chronic Intake of Commercial Sweeteners Induces Changes in Feeding Behavior and Signaling Pathways Related to the Control of Appetite in BALB/c Mice.

Authors:  Alberto A Barrios-Correa; José A Estrada; Caroline Martel; Martin Olivier; Rubén López-Santiago; Irazú Contreras
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-01-28       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Stability of individual differences in sucralose taste preference.

Authors:  Sam Z Bacharach; Donna J Calu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Sucralose induces biochemical responses in Daphnia magna.

Authors:  Ann-Kristin Eriksson Wiklund; Margaretha Adolfsson-Erici; Birgitta Liewenborg; Elena Gorokhova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.