Literature DB >> 16647093

Oral, post-oral and genetic interactions in sweet appetite.

Anthony Sclafani1.   

Abstract

Inbred mouse strains differ in their preferences for sweeteners, due in part to variations in their T1R3 sweet taste receptor. Recent studies of sweet sensitive C57BL/6J (B6) and subsensitive 129P3/J (129) mice indicate that experiential and post-oral effects of sugar substantially modify sweetener preference. In fact, the strain difference in sucrose preference disappeared after the mice were given 23 h/day tests with sucrose at ascending concentrations (0.5-32%). Intragastric infusions of sucrose (16%) also conditioned increased preference for and absolute intake of flavored sweet solutions in B6 and 129 mice. An operant analysis of sweetener appetite revealed, unexpectedly, that sugar-experienced 129 mice respond more vigorously than B6 mice for 16% sucrose rewards. These findings indicate that experiential and nutritional factors can, to some degree, override genetic differences in peripheral taste sensitivity in determining food appetite.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16647093      PMCID: PMC2364709          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.03.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  35 in total

Review 1.  Receptors for bitter and sweet taste.

Authors:  Jean Pierre Montmayeur; Hiroaki Matsunami
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 2.  Oral and postoral determinants of food reward.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2004-07

3.  Genetic influences on saccharin preference of mice.

Authors:  W E Pelz; G Whitney; J C Smith
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1973-02

4.  Expression of sweet taste receptors of the T1R family in the intestinal tract and enteroendocrine cells.

Authors:  J Dyer; K S H Salmon; L Zibrik; S P Shirazi-Beechey
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.407

5.  Mammalian sweet taste receptors.

Authors:  G Nelson; M A Hoon; J Chandrashekar; Y Zhang; N J Ryba; C S Zuker
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-08-10       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Sucrose motivation in sweet "sensitive" (C57BL/6J) and "subsensitive" (129P3/J) mice measured by progressive ratio licking.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2006-03-10

7.  The genetic basis of preference for sweet substances among inbred strains of mice: preference ratio phenotypes and the alleles of the Sac and dpa loci.

Authors:  C G Capeless; G Whitney
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.160

8.  The genetics of tasting in mice. VI. Saccharin, acesulfame, dulcin and sucrose.

Authors:  I E Lush
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Qualitative discrimination of gustatory stimuli in three different strains of mice.

Authors:  Y Ninomiya; T Higashi; H Katsukawa; T Mizukoshi; M Funakoshi
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1984-11-19       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Enhanced sucrose and Polycose preference in sweet "sensitive" (C57BL/6J) and "subsensitive" (129P3/J) mice after experience with these saccharides.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2006-03-09
View more
  17 in total

1.  Effects of selective adaptation on coding sugar and salt tastes in mixtures.

Authors:  Marion E Frank; Holly F Goyert; Bradley K Formaker; Thomas P Hettinger
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 2.  Beyond the Paleolithic prescription: incorporating diversity and flexibility in the study of human diet evolution.

Authors:  Bethany L Turner; Amanda L Thompson
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 7.110

3.  Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric glucose but not fructose or galactose in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2012-03-14

4.  Acute feeding suppression and toxicity of raspberry ketone [4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-butanone] in mice.

Authors:  Lihong Hao; Dushyant Kshatriya; Xinyi Li; Aditi Badrinath; Zuzanna Szmacinski; Michael J Goedken; Marianne Polunas; Nicholas T Bello
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 6.023

5.  Genetics of sweet taste preferences.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Natalia P Bosak; Wely B Floriano; Masashi Inoue; Xia Li; Cailu Lin; Vladimir O Murovets; Danielle R Reed; Vasily A Zolotarev; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Flavour Fragr J       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.576

6.  Taste uncoupled from nutrition fails to sustain the reinforcing properties of food.

Authors:  Jeff A Beeler; James E McCutcheon; Zhen F H Cao; Mari Murakami; Erin Alexander; Mitchell F Roitman; Xiaoxi Zhuang
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Amino acid and carbohydrate preferences in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-08-08

Review 8.  The control of food intake: behavioral versus molecular perspectives.

Authors:  Stephen C Woods
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 27.287

9.  Genetic variance contributes to dopamine receptor antagonist-induced inhibition of sucrose intake in inbred and outbred mouse strains.

Authors:  Cheryl T Dym; Alexander Pinhas; Magdalena Robak; Anthony Sclafani; Richard J Bodnar
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  RYGB progressively increases avidity for a low-energy, artificially sweetened diet in female rats.

Authors:  Nori Geary; Thomas Bächler; Lynda Whiting; Thomas A Lutz; Lori Asarian
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 3.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.