Literature DB >> 19135035

Genetic variance contributes to dopamine receptor antagonist-induced inhibition of sucrose intake in inbred and outbred mouse strains.

Cheryl T Dym1, Alexander Pinhas, Magdalena Robak, Anthony Sclafani, Richard J Bodnar.   

Abstract

Preference and intake of sucrose varies across inbred and outbred strains of mice. Pharmacological analyses revealed that the greatest sensitivity to naltrexone-induced inhibition of sucrose (10%) intake was observed in C57BL10/J and C57BL/6J strains, whereas 129P3/J, SWR/J and SJL/J strains displayed far less sensitivity to naltrexone-induced inhibition of sucrose intake. Given that dopamine D1 (SCH23390) and D2 (raclopride) receptor antagonism potently reduce sucrose intake in outbred rat and mouse strains, the present study examined the possibility of genetic variance in the dose-dependent (50-1600 nmol/kg) and time-dependent (5-120 min) effects of these antagonists upon sucrose (10%) intake in the eight inbred (BALB/cJ, C3H/HeJ, C57BL/6J, C57BL/10J, DBA/2J, SJL/J, SWR/J and 129P3/J) and one outbred (CD-1) mouse strains previously tested with naltrexone. SCH23390 significantly reduced sucrose intake across all five doses in 129P3/J and SJL/J mice, across four doses in C57BL/6J and BALB/cJ mice, across three doses in DBA/2J, SWR/J, C3H/HeJ and C57BL/10J mice, but only at the two highest doses in CD-1 mice. SCH23390 was 2-3-fold more potent in inhibiting sucrose intake in 129P3/J and SJL/J mice relative to CD-1 mice. In contrast, only the highest equimolar 1600 nmol/kg dose of raclopride significantly reduced sucrose intake in the BALB/cJ, C3H/HeJ, C57BL/6J, C57BL/10J, DBA/2J, SJL/J and 129P3/J, but not the SWR/J and CD-1 strains. The present and previous data demonstrate specific and differential patterns of genetic variability in inhibition of sucrose intake by dopamine and opioid antagonists, suggesting that distinct neurochemical mechanisms control sucrose intake across different mouse strains.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19135035      PMCID: PMC2646806          DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.12.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  80 in total

1.  The inheritance of saccharin preference.

Authors:  M NACHMAN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1959-08

2.  Sucrose consumption in mice: major influence of two genetic loci affecting peripheral sensory responses.

Authors:  A A Bachmanov; D R Reed; Y Ninomiya; M Inoue; M G Tordoff; R A Price; G K Beauchamp
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 3.  What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience?

Authors:  K C Berridge; T E Robinson
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  1998-12

4.  Stress promotes major changes in dopamine receptor densities within the mesoaccumbens and nigrostriatal systems.

Authors:  S Cabib; L Giardino; L Calzá; M Zanni; A Mele; S Puglisi-Allegra
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 5.  Food reward: brain substrates of wanting and liking.

Authors:  K C Berridge
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Comparison of dopamine receptor antagonists on hyperlocomotion induced by cocaine, amphetamine, MK-801 and the dopamine D1 agonist C-APB in mice.

Authors:  M F O'Neill; G Shaw
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Quantitative trait loci associated with short-term intake of sucrose, saccharin and quinine solutions in laboratory mice.

Authors:  D A Blizard; B Kotlus; M E Frank
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.160

8.  CB1 receptor knockout mice display reduced ethanol-induced conditioned place preference and increased striatal dopamine D2 receptors.

Authors:  Hakim Houchi; Daniela Babovic; Olivier Pierrefiche; Catherine Ledent; Martine Daoust; Mickaël Naassila
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.853

9.  Effects of the experimental diabetes on dopamine D1 receptor-mediated locomotor-enhancing activity in mice.

Authors:  A Saitoh; K Morita; M Sodeyama; J Kamei
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.533

10.  Reward and reinforcement produced by drinking sucrose: two processes that may depend on different neurotransmitters.

Authors:  A Agmo; A Galvan; B Talamantes
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.533

View more
  9 in total

1.  Strain differences in sucrose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.

Authors:  Alexander Pinhas; Michael Aviel; Michael Koen; Simon Gurgov; Vanessa Acosta; Michael Israel; Leonid Kakuriev; Elena Guskova; Isabelle Fuzailov; Khalid Touzani; Anthony Sclafani; Richard J Bodnar
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-09-14

2.  Genetic differences in the behavioral organization of binge eating, conditioned food reward, and compulsive-like eating in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J strains.

Authors:  Richard K Babbs; Julia C Kelliher; Julia L Scotellaro; Kimberly P Luttik; Megan K Mulligan; Camron D Bryant
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2018-09-24

3.  Genetic variance contributes to dopamine and opioid receptor antagonist-induced inhibition of intralipid (fat) intake in inbred and outbred mouse strains.

Authors:  Cheryl T Dym; Veronica S Bae; Tamar Kraft; Yakov Yakubov; Amanda Winn; Anthony Sclafani; Richard J Bodnar
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Double-dissociation of D1 and opioid receptor antagonism effects on the acquisition of sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in BALB/c and SWR mice.

Authors:  Cheryl T Dym; Tamar T Kraft; Veronica S Bae; Yakov Yakubov; Khalid Touzani; Anthony Sclafani; Richard J Bodnar
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 3.533

5.  Dopamine D1 and opioid receptor antagonists differentially reduce the acquisition and expression of fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in BALB/c and SWR mice.

Authors:  Tamar T Kraft; Yakov Yakubov; Donald Huang; Gregory Fitzgerald; Elona Natanova; Anthony Sclafani; Richard J Bodnar
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-07-26

6.  Different contributions of dopamine D1 and D2 receptor activity to alcohol potentiation of brain stimulation reward in C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice.

Authors:  Eric W Fish; Jeffrey F DiBerto; Michael C Krouse; J Elliott Robinson; C J Malanga
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  Genetics of mouse behavioral and peripheral neural responses to sucrose.

Authors:  Cailu Lin; Masashi Inoue; Xia Li; Natalia P Bosak; Yutaka Ishiwatari; Michael G Tordoff; Gary K Beauchamp; Alexander A Bachmanov; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 2.957

8.  Does Anhedonia Presage Increased Risk of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder? : Adolescent Anhedonia and Posttraumatic Disorders.

Authors:  Victoria B Risbrough; Laura M Glynn; Elysia P Davis; Curt A Sandman; Andre Obenaus; Hal S Stern; David B Keator; Michael A Yassa; Tallie Z Baram; Dewleen G Baker
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018

9.  Fragmentation and high entropy of neonatal experience predict adolescent emotional outcome.

Authors:  J Molet; K Heins; X Zhuo; Y T Mei; L Regev; T Z Baram; H Stern
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 6.222

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.