Literature DB >> 22445944

Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric glucose but not fructose or galactose in C57BL/6J mice.

Anthony Sclafani1, Karen Ackroff.   

Abstract

The present study determined if mice, like rats, differ in their flavor conditioning responses to intragastric (IG) infusions of three common monosaccharide sugars. In Experiment 1, C57BL/6J mice were trained to drink a flavored saccharin solution (the CS+) paired with intragastric (IG) self-infusions of 16% glucose, fructose or galactose and a different flavored solution (the CS-) paired with IG water infusions during 22 h/day training sessions. The glucose infusions increased CS+ intakes during training and produced a strong CS+ preference (~87%) in two-bottle choice tests. In contrast, the fructose and galactose infusions reduced CS training intakes and did not condition a CS+ preference. Experiment 2 determined if reducing fructose and galactose concentration would enhance conditioning. However, IG infusions of 8% sugar also failed to condition CS+ preferences. The robust conditioning response to IG glucose confirms results obtained with rats, but the indifference of mice to IG fructose and galactose contrasts with preference and avoidance responses observed in rats. The effectiveness of glucose to condition preferences suggests an important role for glucose-specific sensors rather than gut "sweet" taste receptors in the postoral modulation of carbohydrate appetite.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22445944      PMCID: PMC3349008          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  28 in total

1.  Gut T1R3 sweet taste receptors do not mediate sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Damien S Glass; Robert F Margolskee; John I Glendinning
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  Robust preference for a flavor paired with intragastric glucose acquired in a single trial.

Authors:  Kevin P Myers
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 3.  Vagal and hormonal gut-brain communication: from satiation to satisfaction.

Authors:  H-R Berthoud
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.598

4.  Sugar and fat conditioned flavor preferences in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: oral and postoral interactions.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; John I Glendinning
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 3.619

5.  Post-oral infusion sites that support glucose-conditioned flavor preferences in rats.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Yeh-Min Yiin; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2009-12-21

6.  Taste does not determine daily intake of dilute sugar solutions in mice.

Authors:  J I Glendinning; F Beltran; L Benton; S Cheng; J Gieseke; J Gillman; H N Spain
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 3.619

7.  Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric nutrient infusions in food restricted and free-feeding rats.

Authors:  Yeh-Min Yiin; Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2005-02-15

Review 8.  Biology of human sodium glucose transporters.

Authors:  Ernest M Wright; Donald D F Loo; Bruce A Hirayama
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 37.312

9.  Intragastric infusion of glucose enhances the rewarding effect of sorbitol fatty acid ester ingestion as measured by conditioned place preference in mice.

Authors:  Shigenobu Matsumura; Takeshi Yoneda; Syoji Aki; Ai Eguchi; Yasuko Manabe; Satoshi Tsuzuki; Kazuo Inoue; Tohru Fushiki
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-01-05

Review 10.  Common sense about taste: from mammals to insects.

Authors:  David A Yarmolinsky; Charles S Zuker; Nicholas J P Ryba
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  34 in total

1.  Transformation of postingestive glucose responses after deletion of sweet taste receptor subunits or gastric bypass surgery.

Authors:  Maartje C P Geraedts; Tatsuyuki Takahashi; Stephan Vigues; Michele L Markwardt; Andongfac Nkobena; Renee E Cockerham; Andras Hajnal; Cedrick D Dotson; Mark A Rizzo; Steven D Munger
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 4.310

Review 2.  Role of gut nutrient sensing in stimulating appetite and conditioning food preferences.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Flavor preferences conditioned by nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners in mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-02-10

4.  CAST/EiJ and C57BL/6J Mice Differ in Their Oral and Postoral Attraction to Glucose and Fructose.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Austin S Vural; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 5.  From appetite setpoint to appetition: 50years of ingestive behavior research.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2018-01-02

6.  Rapid post-oral stimulation of intake and flavor conditioning in rats by glucose but not a non-metabolizable glucose analog.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-05-06

7.  Flavor preference conditioning by different sugars in sweet ageusic Trpm5 knockout mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-12-12

8.  Flavor change and food deprivation are not critical for post-oral glucose appetition in mice.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-12-04

9.  Maltodextrin and sucrose preferences in sweet-sensitive (C57BL/6J) and subsensitive (129P3/J) mice revisited.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-08-12

10.  MCH receptor deletion does not impair glucose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Antoine Adamantidis; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-05-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.