Literature DB >> 26707654

RYGB progressively increases avidity for a low-energy, artificially sweetened diet in female rats.

Nori Geary1, Thomas Bächler2, Lynda Whiting2, Thomas A Lutz3, Lori Asarian4.   

Abstract

Weight re-gain within 2 y after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is significantly associated with increased intake of and cravings for sweet foods. Here we describe a novel model of this late increase in sweet appetite. Ovariectomized RYGB and Sham-operated rats, with or without estradiol treatment, were maintained on Ensure liquid diet and offered a low-energy, artificially sweetened diet (ASD) 2 h/d. First, we tested rats more than six months after RYGB. ASD meals were larger in RYGB than Sham rats, whereas Ensure meals were smaller. General physical activity increased during ASD meals in RYGB rats, but not during Ensure meals. Second, new rats were adapted to ASD before surgery, and were then offered ASD again during 4-10 wk following surgery. Estradiol-treated RYGB rats lost the most weight and progressively increased ASD intake to >20 g/2 h in wk 9-10 vs. ∼3 g/2 h in Sham rats. Finally, the same rats were then treated with leptin or saline for 8 d. Leptin did not affect body weight, Ensure intake, or activity during meals, but slightly reduced ASD intake in estradiol-treated RYGB rats. Food-anticipatory activity was increased in estradiol-treated RYGB rats during the saline-injection tests. Because increased meal-related physical activity together with larger meals is evidence of hunger in rats, these data suggest that (1) RYGB can increase hunger for a low-energy sweet food in rats and (2) low leptin levels contribute to this hunger, but are not its only cause. This provides a unique rat model for the increased avidity for sweets that is significantly associated with weight recidivism late after RYGB.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavioral sequence of postprandial satiety; Estradiol; Hunger; Leptin; Meal-related activity; Sweet cravings

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26707654      PMCID: PMC4728070          DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.11.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  77 in total

1.  Leptin as a modulator of sweet taste sensitivities in mice.

Authors:  K Kawai; K Sugimoto; K Nakashima; H Miura; Y Ninomiya
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Taste responsiveness to sweeteners is resistant to elevations in plasma leptin.

Authors:  John I Glendinning; Amanda E T Elson; Salina Kalik; Yvett Sosa; Christa M Patterson; Martin G Myers; Steven D Munger
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 3.  Oral, post-oral and genetic interactions in sweet appetite.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2006-04-27

4.  Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes--3-year outcomes.

Authors:  Philip R Schauer; Deepak L Bhatt; John P Kirwan; Kathy Wolski; Stacy A Brethauer; Sankar D Navaneethan; Ali Aminian; Claire E Pothier; Esther S H Kim; Steven E Nissen; Sangeeta R Kashyap
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  GLP-1 receptor signaling is not required for reduced body weight after RYGB in rodents.

Authors:  Jianping Ye; Zheng Hao; Michael B Mumphrey; R Leigh Townsend; Laurel M Patterson; Nicholas Stylopoulos; Heike Münzberg; Christopher D Morrison; Daniel J Drucker; Hans-Rudolf Berthoud
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.619

6.  Epinephrine inhibits feeding nonspecifically in the rat.

Authors:  V Hinton; M Esguerra; N Farhoody; J Granger; N Geary
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1987

7.  Caloric deprivation increases responsivity of attention and reward brain regions to intake, anticipated intake, and images of palatable foods.

Authors:  Eric Stice; Kyle Burger; Sonja Yokum
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Roux-en-Y gastric bypass increases intravenous ethanol self-administration in dietary obese rats.

Authors:  James E Polston; Carolyn E Pritchett; Jonathan M Tomasko; Ann M Rogers; Lorenzo Leggio; Panayotis K Thanos; Nora D Volkow; Andras Hajnal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Progressive rise in gut hormone levels after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass suggests gut adaptation and explains altered satiety.

Authors:  C M Borg; C W le Roux; M A Ghatei; S R Bloom; A G Patel; S J B Aylwin
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 10.  Mind over platter: pre-meal planning and the control of meal size in humans.

Authors:  J M Brunstrom
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.095

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Do Food Preferences Change After Bariatric Surgery?

Authors:  Daniel Gero; Robert E Steinert; Carel W le Roux; Marco Bueter
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 2.  Recent Advances in the Neurobiology of Altered Motivation Following Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Julianna N Brutman; Sunil Sirohi; Jon F Davis
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  The Effects of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Glucose- vs. Fructose-Associated Conditioned Flavor Preference.

Authors:  Tadashi Inui; Chizuko Inui-Yamamoto; Fabienne Schmid; Ginger D Blonde; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2022-02-08

4.  Gastric bypass in female rats lowers concentrated sugar solution intake and preference without affecting brief-access licking after long-term sugar exposure.

Authors:  Kellie M Hyde; Ginger D Blonde; Marco Bueter; Carel W le Roux; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.619

5.  Oromotor and somatic taste reactivity during sucrose meals reveals internal state and stimulus palatability after gastric bypass in rats.

Authors:  Ginger D Blonde; Clare M Mathes; Tadashi Inui; Elizabeth A Hamel; Ruth K Price; M Barbara E Livingstone; Carel W Le Roux; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.619

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.