Literature DB >> 6518376

Qualitative discrimination of gustatory stimuli in three different strains of mice.

Y Ninomiya, T Higashi, H Katsukawa, T Mizukoshi, M Funakoshi.   

Abstract

Qualitative similarities and differences among various taste stimuli were examined by comparing the generalization patterns of a conditioned aversion from single chemicals to other compounds in 3 different strains of mice (BALB, C3H and C57BL mice). It was observed as a common characteristic in all 3 strains of mice that generalization gradients among sugars and saccharin Na appeared in the order sucrose--saccharin Na--fructose--glucose--maltose, in which the closer stimuli generalized more strongly to each other. Strain differences were found in sensitivities to D-phenylalanine and L-proline, which generalized to sugars and saccharin Na in C57BL mice, but not in BALB and C3H mice. These strain differences correspond quite well to those previously observed in the responses of single chorda tympani fibers to these amino acids in the 3 strains of mice. A hierarchical cluster analysis and a multidimensional scaling analysis showed that 15 compounds including the 4 basic taste stimuli (sucrose, NaCl, HCl and quinine-HCl) were classified into 7 different groups according to their behavioral similarities and some amino acids were not grouped with any of the 4 basic taste stimuli in the 3 strains of mice. These results suggest the possibility that mice perceive tastes of these amino acids in a way different from human taste primaries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6518376     DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(84)91183-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  25 in total

1.  Nutrient preference and diet-induced adiposity in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  A A Bachmanov; D R Reed; M G Tordoff; R A Price; G K Beauchamp
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2001-03

2.  Orosensory detection of sucrose, maltose, and glucose is severely impaired in mice lacking T1R2 or T1R3, but Polycose sensitivity remains relatively normal.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Citric acid and quinine share perceived chemosensory features making oral discrimination difficult in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Clare M Mathes; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Taste-evoked responses to sweeteners in the nucleus of the solitary tract differ between C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  Stuart A McCaughey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Cross-Generalization Profile to Orosensory Stimuli of Rats Conditioned to Avoid a High Fat/High Sugar Diet.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Timothy H Moran
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 6.  The functional role of the T1R family of receptors in sweet taste and feeding.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Kimberly R Smith; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-03-02

Review 7.  Oral, post-oral and genetic interactions in sweet appetite.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2006-04-27

8.  Amino acid and carbohydrate preferences in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-08-08

9.  Maltodextrin and sucrose preferences in sweet-sensitive (C57BL/6J) and subsensitive (129P3/J) mice revisited.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-08-12

Review 10.  Cracking taste codes by tapping into sensory neuron impulse traffic.

Authors:  Marion E Frank; Robert F Lundy; Robert J Contreras
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 11.685

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.