Literature DB >> 22712685

Taste uncoupled from nutrition fails to sustain the reinforcing properties of food.

Jeff A Beeler1, James E McCutcheon, Zhen F H Cao, Mari Murakami, Erin Alexander, Mitchell F Roitman, Xiaoxi Zhuang.   

Abstract

Recent findings suggest the reward system encodes metabolic value independent of taste, provoking speculation that the hedonic value of taste could be derived from nutritional value as a secondary appetitive property. We therefore dissociated and compared the impact of nutrition and taste on appetitive behavior in several paradigms. Though taste alone induces preference and increased consumption, in the absence of nutritional value its reinforcing properties are greatly diminished and it does not, like sucrose, induce increased responding over time. In agreement with behavioral data, saccharin-evoked (but not sucrose-evoked) dopamine release is greatly attenuated following pre-exposure, suggesting that nutritional value is critical for dopamine-mediated reward and reinforcement. Further supporting the primacy of nutrition over taste, genetically increased dopaminergic tone enhances incentive associated with nutritional value with minimal impact on taste-based, hedonic incentive. Overall, we suggest that the sensory-hedonic incentive value associated with taste functions as a conditioned stimulus that requires nutritional value to sustainably organize appetitive behavior.
© 2012 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience © 2012 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22712685      PMCID: PMC3424366          DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08167.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  93 in total

Review 1.  Incentive-sensitization and addiction.

Authors:  T E Robinson; K C Berridge
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  Differential responsiveness of dopamine transmission to food-stimuli in nucleus accumbens shell/core compartments.

Authors:  V Bassareo; G Di Chiara
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Phasic nucleus accumbens dopamine release encodes effort- and delay-related costs.

Authors:  Jeremy J Day; Joshua L Jones; R Mark Wightman; Regina M Carelli
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 4.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Extracellular dopamine levels in striatal subregions track shifts in motivation and response cost during instrumental conditioning.

Authors:  Sean B Ostlund; Kate M Wassum; Niall P Murphy; Bernard W Balleine; Nigel T Maidment
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Sucrose-predictive cues evoke greater phasic dopamine release than saccharin-predictive cues.

Authors:  James E McCutcheon; Jeff A Beeler; Mitchell F Roitman
Journal:  Synapse       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 2.562

7.  Food reward in the absence of taste receptor signaling.

Authors:  Ivan E de Araujo; Albino J Oliveira-Maia; Tatyana D Sotnikova; Raul R Gainetdinov; Marc G Caron; Miguel A L Nicolelis; Sidney A Simon
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Caffeine place conditioning in rats: comparison with cocaine and ethanol.

Authors:  N A Patkina; E E Zvartau
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.600

9.  Neuroleptic-induced "anhedonia" in rats: pimozide blocks reward quality of food.

Authors:  R A Wise; J Spindler; H deWit; G J Gerberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1978-07-21       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Dopamine, effort, and decision making: theoretical comment on Bardgett et al. (2009).

Authors:  John D Salamone
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.912

View more
  34 in total

1.  Flavor preferences conditioned by nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners in mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-02-10

2.  BALB/c and SWR inbred mice differ in post-oral fructose appetition as revealed by sugar versus non-nutritive sweetener tests.

Authors:  Tamar T Kraft; Donald Huang; Melanie Lolier; Deena Warshaw; Sam LaMagna; Elona Natanova; Anthony Sclafani; Richard J Bodnar
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-10-17

3.  Nucleus accumbens core dopamine signaling tracks the need-based motivational value of food-paired cues.

Authors:  Tara J Aitken; Venuz Y Greenfield; Kate M Wassum
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2016-01-24       Impact factor: 5.372

4.  Homeostatic reinforcement learning for integrating reward collection and physiological stability.

Authors:  Mehdi Keramati; Boris Gutkin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Nutrient-conditioned intake stimulation does not require a distinctive flavor cue in rats.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.868

6.  Striatal Dopamine D2 Receptors Regulate Cost Sensitivity and Behavioral Thrift.

Authors:  Devry Mourra; Federico Gnazzo; Steve Cobos; Jeff A Beeler
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Dopamine D2 Receptor Signaling in the Nucleus Accumbens Comprises a Metabolic-Cognitive Brain Interface Regulating Metabolic Components of Glucose Reinforcement.

Authors:  Michael Michaelides; Michael L Miller; Jennifer A DiNieri; Juan L Gomez; Elizabeth Schwartz; Gabor Egervari; Gene Jack Wang; Charles V Mobbs; Nora D Volkow; Yasmin L Hurd
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 7.853

8.  Post-oral glucose stimulation of intake and conditioned flavor preference in C57BL/6J mice: a concentration-response study.

Authors:  Steven Zukerman; Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2012-11-28

9.  Glucose utilization rates regulate intake levels of artificial sweeteners.

Authors:  Luis A Tellez; Xueying Ren; Wenfei Han; Sara Medina; Jozélia G Ferreira; Catherine W Yeckel; Ivan E de Araujo
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Enhanced consumption of salient solutions following pedunculopontine tegmental lesions.

Authors:  D A A MacLaren; T Markovic; D Daniels; S D Clark
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.