Literature DB >> 16571732

Roll rotation cues influence roll tilt perception assayed using a somatosensory technique.

Sukyung Park1, Claire Gianna-Poulin, F Owen Black, Scott Wood, Daniel M Merfeld.   

Abstract

We investigated how the nervous system processes ambiguous cues from the otolith organs by measuring roll tilt perception elicited by two motion paradigms. In one paradigm (tilt), eight subjects were sinusoidally tilted in roll with the axis of rotation near ear level. Stimulus frequencies ranged from 0.005 to 0.7 Hz, and the peak amplitude of tilt was 20 degrees . During this paradigm, subjects experienced a sinusoidal variation of interaural gravitational force with a peak of 0.34 g. The second motion paradigm (translation) was designed to yield the same sinusoidal variation in interaural force but did not include a roll canal cue. This was achieved by sinusoidally translating the subjects along their interaural axis. For the 0.7-Hz translation trial, the subjects were simply translated from side to side. A centrifuge was used for the 0.005- to 0.5-Hz translation trials; the subjects were rotated in yaw at 250 degrees /s for 5 min before initiating sinusoidal translations yielding an interaural otolith stimulus composed of both centrifugal and radial acceleration. Using a somatosensory task to measure roll tilt perception, we found substantial differences in tilt perception during the two motion paradigms. Because the primary difference between the two motion paradigms was the presence of roll canal cues during roll tilt trials, these perceptual differences suggest that canal cues influence tilt perception. Specifically, rotational cues provided by the semicircular canals help the CNS resolve ambiguous otolith cues during head tilt, yielding more accurate tilt perception.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16571732      PMCID: PMC1661663          DOI: 10.1152/jn.01163.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  32 in total

1.  Dynamics of squirrel monkey linear vestibuloocular reflex and interactions with fixation distance.

Authors:  L Telford; S H Seidman; G D Paige
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The dynamic contributions of the otolith organs to human ocular torsion.

Authors:  D M Merfeld; W Teiwes; A H Clarke; H Scherer; L R Young
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Computation of inertial motion: neural strategies to resolve ambiguous otolith information.

Authors:  D E Angelaki; M Q McHenry; J D Dickman; S D Newlands; B J Hess
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Linear acceleration perception: frequency dependence of the hilltop illusion.

Authors:  S Glasauer
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1995

5.  Perceived body position and the visual horizontal.

Authors:  F Mast; T Jarchow
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  Tilt perception during dynamic linear acceleration.

Authors:  S H Seidman; L Telford; G D Paige
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The effect of ocular torsional position on perception of the roll-tilt of visual stimuli.

Authors:  S W Wade; I S Curthoys
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Humans use internal models to estimate gravity and linear acceleration.

Authors:  D M Merfeld; L Zupan; R J Peterka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-04-15       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Modeling the vestibulo-ocular reflex of the squirrel monkey during eccentric rotation and roll tilt.

Authors:  D M Merfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Vestibular perception and action employ qualitatively different mechanisms. II. VOR and perceptual responses during combined Tilt&Translation.

Authors:  Daniel M Merfeld; Sukyung Park; Claire Gianna-Poulin; F Owen Black; Scott Wood
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  13 in total

1.  Perceived tilt and translation during variable-radius swing motion with congruent or conflicting visual and vestibular cues.

Authors:  Andrew A Rader; Charles M Oman; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Tilt and translation motion perception during off-vertical axis rotation.

Authors:  Scott J Wood; Millard F Reschke; Laura A Sarmiento; Gilles Clément
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Motion perception during variable-radius swing motion in darkness.

Authors:  A A Rader; C M Oman; D M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Dimensional reduction in sensorimotor systems: a framework for understanding muscle coordination of posture.

Authors:  Lena H Ting
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.453

5.  The time constant of the somatogravic illusion.

Authors:  B J Correia Grácio; K N de Winkel; E L Groen; M Wentink; J E Bos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-04       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Modeling direction discrimination thresholds for yaw rotations around an earth-vertical axis for arbitrary motion profiles.

Authors:  Florian Soyka; Paolo Robuffo Giordano; Michael Barnett-Cowan; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Human perceptual overestimation of whole body roll tilt in hypergravity.

Authors:  Torin K Clark; Michael C Newman; Charles M Oman; Daniel M Merfeld; Laurence R Young
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Abnormal Tilt Perception During Centrifugation in Patients with Vestibular Migraine.

Authors:  Joanne Wang; Richard F Lewis
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-08

9.  Phase-linking and the perceived motion during off-vertical axis rotation.

Authors:  Jan E Holly; Scott J Wood; Gin McCollum
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 10.  A vestibular sensation: probabilistic approaches to spatial perception.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; Eliana M Klier; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.