Literature DB >> 8836695

The dynamic contributions of the otolith organs to human ocular torsion.

D M Merfeld1, W Teiwes, A H Clarke, H Scherer, L R Young.   

Abstract

We measured human ocular torsion (OT) monocularly (using video) and binocularly (using search coils) while sinusoidally accelerating (0.7 g) five human subjects along an earth-horizontal axis at five frequencies (0.35, 0.4, 0.5, 0.75, and 1.0 Hz). The compensatory nature of OT was investigated by changing the relative orientation of the dynamic (linear acceleration) and static (gravitational) cues. Four subject orientations were investigated: (1) Y-upright-acceleration along the interaural (y) axis while upright; (2) Y-supine-acceleration along the y-axis while supine; (3) Z-RED-acceleration along the dorsoventral (z) axis with right ear down; (4) Z-supine-acceleration along the z-axis while supine. Linear acceleration in the Y-upright, Y-supine and Z-RED orientations elicited conjugate OT. The smaller response in the Z-supine orientation appeared disconjugate. The amplitude of the response decreased and the phase lag increased with increasing frequency for each orientation. This frequency dependence does not match the frequency response of the regular or irregular afferent otolith neurons; therefore the response dynamics cannot be explained by simple peripheral mechanisms. The Y-upright responses were larger than the Y-supine responses (P < 0.05). This difference indicates that OT must be more complicated than a simple low-pass filtered response to interaural shear force, since the dynamic shear force along the interaural axis was identical in these two orientations. The Y-supine responses were, in turn, larger than the Z-RED responses (P < 0.01). Interestingly, the vector sum of the Y-supine responses plus Z-RED responses was not significantly different (P = 0.99) from the Y-upright responses. This suggests that, in this frequency range, the conjugate OT response during Y-upright stimulation might be composed of two components: (1) a response to shear force along the y-axis (as in Y-supine stimulation), and (2) a response to roll tilt of gravitoinertial force (as in Z-RED stimulation).

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Neuroscience; NASA Discipline Number 16-10; NASA Program Space Physiology and Countermeasures; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8836695     DOI: 10.1007/bf00228562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  21 in total

1.  An analysis of ocular counterrolling in response to body positions in three-dimensional space.

Authors:  U J Bucher; F Mast; N Bischof
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.435

2.  Modeling the vestibulo-ocular reflex of the squirrel monkey during eccentric rotation and roll tilt.

Authors:  D M Merfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Perceptual and eye movement responses elicited by linear acceleration following spaceflight.

Authors:  D M Merfeld; J R Christie; L R Young
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1994-11

4.  Ocular counterrolling as an indicator of vestibular otolith function.

Authors:  S G Diamond; C H Markham
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Otolith organ activity within earth standard, one-half standard and zero gravity environments.

Authors:  E F Miller; A Graybiel; R S Kellogg
Journal:  Aerosp Med       Date:  1966-04

6.  Visually-induced eye torsion and tilt adaptation.

Authors:  I P Howard; W B Templeton
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1964-10       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Human ocular counterroll: assessment of static and dynamic properties from electromagnetic scleral coil recordings.

Authors:  H Collewijn; J Van der Steen; L Ferman; T C Jansen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. III. Response dynamics.

Authors:  C Fernández; J M Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. II. Directional selectivity and force-response relations.

Authors:  C Fernández; J M Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Human eye movement response to z-axis linear acceleration: the effect of varying the phase relationships between visual and vestibular inputs.

Authors:  C E Lathan; C Wall; L R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  8 in total

1.  [Vestibular evoked muscle potentials dependency on neural origin and the location of an acoustic neuroma].

Authors:  C Hamann; J Rudolf; H von Specht; B Freigang
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Roll rotation cues influence roll tilt perception assayed using a somatosensory technique.

Authors:  Sukyung Park; Claire Gianna-Poulin; F Owen Black; Scott Wood; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Tilt and translation motion perception during off-vertical axis rotation.

Authors:  Scott J Wood; Millard F Reschke; Laura A Sarmiento; Gilles Clément
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Human ocular torsion and perceived roll responses to linear acceleration.

Authors:  Lionel H Zupan; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Vergence-mediated changes in the axis of eye rotation during the human vestibulo-ocular reflex can occur independent of eye position.

Authors:  Americo A Migliaccio; Phillip D Cremer; Swee T Aw; G Michael Halmagyi; Ian S Curthoys; Lloyd B Minor; Michael J Todd
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Roll tilt psychophysics in rhesus monkeys during vestibular and visual stimulation.

Authors:  Richard F Lewis; Csilla Haburcakova; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Translational motion perception and vestiboocular responses in the absence of non-inertial cues.

Authors:  S H Seidman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Complex gaze stabilization in mantis shrimp.

Authors:  Ilse M Daly; Martin J How; Julian C Partridge; Nicholas W Roberts
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 5.349

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.