Literature DB >> 19625542

Motion perception during variable-radius swing motion in darkness.

A A Rader1, C M Oman, D M Merfeld.   

Abstract

Using a variable-radius roll swing motion paradigm, we examined the influence of interaural (y-axis) and dorsoventral (z-axis) force modulation on perceived tilt and translation by measuring perception of horizontal translation, roll tilt, and distance from center of rotation (radius) at 0.45 and 0.8 Hz using standard magnitude estimation techniques (primarily verbal reports) in darkness. Results show that motion perception was significantly influenced by both y- and z-axis forces. During constant radius trials, subjects' perceptions of tilt and translation were generally almost veridical. By selectively pairing radius (1.22 and 0.38 m) and frequency (0.45 and 0.8 Hz, respectively), the y-axis acceleration could be tailored in opposition to gravity so that the combined y-axis gravitoinertial force (GIF) variation at the subject's ears was reduced to approximately 0.035 m/s(2) - in effect, the y-axis GIF was "nulled" below putative perceptual threshold levels. With y-axis force nulling, subjects overestimated their tilt angle and underestimated their horizontal translation and radius. For some y-axis nulling trials, a radial linear acceleration at twice the tilt frequency (0.25 m/s(2) at 0.9 Hz, 0.13 m/s(2) at 1.6 Hz) was simultaneously applied to reduce the z-axis force variations caused by centripetal acceleration and by changes in the z-axis component of gravity during tilt. For other trials, the phase of this radial linear acceleration was altered to double the magnitude of the z-axis force variations. z-axis force nulling further increased the perceived tilt angle and further decreased perceived horizontal translation and radius relative to the y-axis nulling trials, while z-axis force doubling had the opposite effect. Subject reports were remarkably geometrically consistent; an observer model-based analysis suggests that perception was influenced by knowledge of swing geometry.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19625542      PMCID: PMC2775380          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00116.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  32 in total

1.  Three-dimensional eye-movement responses to off-vertical axis rotations in humans.

Authors:  T Haslwanter; R Jaeger; S Mayr; M Fetter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Voluntary, non-visual control of the human vestibulo-ocular reflex.

Authors:  C C Barr; L W Schultheis; D A Robinson
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1976 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.494

3.  The nature of the vestibular stimulus.

Authors:  L B W JONGKEES; J J GROEN
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1946-10       Impact factor: 1.469

4.  Thresholds of perception for periodic linear motion.

Authors:  A J Gundry
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1978-05

5.  Neural processing of gravitoinertial cues in humans. III. Modeling tilt and translation responses.

Authors:  D M Merfeld; L H Zupan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Thresholds for the detection of the direction of whole-body, linear movement in the horizontal plane.

Authors:  A J Benson; M B Spencer; J R Stott
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1986-11

7.  Erroneous perception of vertical motion by humans seated in the upright position.

Authors:  R Malcolm; G M Jones
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 1.494

8.  Linear acceleration perception: threshold determinations with the use of a parallel swing.

Authors:  A J Greven; W J Oosterveld; W J Rademakers
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1974-12

9.  The effect of semicircular cana stimulation during tilting on the subsequent perception of the visual vertical.

Authors:  C W Stockwell; F E Guedry
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 1.494

10.  Self-motion magnitude estimation during linear oscillation: changes with head orientation and following fatigue.

Authors:  D E Parker; D L Wood; W L Gulledge; R L Goodrich
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1979-11
View more
  7 in total

1.  Perceived tilt and translation during variable-radius swing motion with congruent or conflicting visual and vestibular cues.

Authors:  Andrew A Rader; Charles M Oman; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Human perceptual overestimation of whole body roll tilt in hypergravity.

Authors:  Torin K Clark; Michael C Newman; Charles M Oman; Daniel M Merfeld; Laurence R Young
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Electrical stimulation of semicircular canal afferents affects the perception of head orientation.

Authors:  Richard F Lewis; Csilla Haburcakova; Wangsong Gong; Daniel Lee; Daniel Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Modeling human perception of orientation in altered gravity.

Authors:  Torin K Clark; Michael C Newman; Charles M Oman; Daniel M Merfeld; Laurence R Young
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-05

5.  Perception of rotation, path, and heading in circular trajectories.

Authors:  Suzanne A E Nooij; Alessandro Nesti; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Paolo Pretto
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Effects of motion paradigm on human perception of tilt and translation.

Authors:  Gilles Clément; Kara H Beaton; Millard F Reschke; Scott J Wood
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Derealization and motion-perception related to repeated exposure to 3T Magnetic Resonance Image scanner in healthy adults.

Authors:  Sergio Martínez-Gallardo; José A Miguel-Puga; Davis Cooper-Bribiesca; Adolfo M Bronstein; Kathrine Jáuregui-Renaud
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.354

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.