Literature DB >> 8886364

Perceived body position and the visual horizontal.

F Mast1, T Jarchow.   

Abstract

This contribution examines the relation between the subjective visual vertical, the subjective visual horizontal, and the perceived body position of human subjects. Firmly fixed on a tiltable chair with head and torso restrained, 11 healthy subjects were rolled sideways and indicated their subjective horizontal body position. In these positions the subjects were also asked to adjust a luminous line alternately to the vertical and to the horizontal. The adjustments of the subjective horizontal body position cluster around a mean of 96.3 degrees with a remarkably broad range (SD: 19.7 degrees). In the subjective horizontal body position, the luminous line does not appear horizontal when in line with one's own spinal axis. It is set further down by 27.4 degrees on average and, therefore, perpendicular to the subjective visual vertical. This finding supports the idea that the judgement of the own body position and the judgement of the orientation of a seen object respective to gravity are based on different references. Contradictory to other investigations [23,24], is the empirical fact that the individual subjects were not able to adjust the horizontal body position with the reported accuracy (range of mean adjustments 77.5 to 117.6 degrees).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8886364     DOI: 10.1016/0361-9230(96)00132-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Bull        ISSN: 0361-9230            Impact factor:   4.077


  19 in total

1.  Influence of dynamic tilts on the perception of earth-vertical.

Authors:  Karin Jaggi-Schwarz; Bernhard J M Hess
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Reciprocal error behavior in estimated body position and subjective visual vertical.

Authors:  K Jaggi-Schwarz; M Ortega; B J M Hess
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Localization of the subjective vertical during roll, pitch, and recumbent yaw body tilt.

Authors:  Simone B Bortolami; Alberto Pierobon; Paul DiZio; James R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Roll rotation cues influence roll tilt perception assayed using a somatosensory technique.

Authors:  Sukyung Park; Claire Gianna-Poulin; F Owen Black; Scott Wood; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Role of gravity-based information on the orientation and localization of the perceived body midline.

Authors:  Hadrien Ceyte; Corinne Cian; Vincent Nougier; Isabelle Olivier; Marion Trousselard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-25       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Influence of gravitoinertial force level on the subjective vertical during recumbent yaw axis body tilt.

Authors:  A S Bryan; S B Bortolami; J Ventura; P DiZio; J R Lackner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Antihysteresis of perceived longitudinal body axis during continuous quasi-static whole-body rotation in the earth-vertical roll plane.

Authors:  M Tatalias; C J Bockisch; G Bertolini; D Straumann; A Palla
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Visually guided adjustments of body posture in the roll plane.

Authors:  A A Tarnutzer; C J Bockisch; D Straumann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Perception of the dynamic visual vertical during sinusoidal linear motion.

Authors:  A Pomante; L P J Selen; W P Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Precision and accuracy of the subjective haptic vertical in the roll plane.

Authors:  Jeanine R Schuler; Christopher J Bockisch; Dominik Straumann; Alexander A Tarnutzer
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.