Literature DB >> 9551831

Tilt perception during dynamic linear acceleration.

S H Seidman1, L Telford, G D Paige.   

Abstract

Head tilt is a rotation of the head relative to gravity, as exemplified by head roll or pitch from the natural upright orientation. Tilt stimulates both the otolith organs, owing to shifts in gravitational orientation, and the semicircular canals in response to head rotation, which in turn drive a variety of behavioral and perceptual responses. Studies of tilt perception typically have not adequately isolated otolith and canal inputs or their dynamic contributions. True tilt cannot readily dissociate otolith from canal influences. Alternatively, centrifugation generates centripetal accelerations that simulate tilt, but still entails a rotatory (canal) stimulus during important periods of the stimulus profiles. We reevaluated the perception of head tilt in humans, but limited the stimulus to linear forces alone, thus isolating the influence of otolith inputs. This was accomplished by employing a centrifugation technique with a variable-radius spinning sled. This allowed us to accelerate the sled to a constant angular velocity (128 degrees/s), with the subject centered, and then apply dynamic centripetal accelerations after all rotatory perceptions were extinguished. These stimuli were presented in the subjects' naso-occipital axis by translating the subjects 50 cm eccentrically either forward or backward. Centripetal accelerations were thus induced (0.25 g), which combined with gravity to yield a dynamically shifting gravitoinertial force simulating pitch-tilt, but without actually rotating the head. A magnitude-estimation task was employed to characterize the dynamic perception of pitch-tilt. Tilt perception responded sluggishly to linear acceleration, typically reaching a peak after 10-30 s. Tilt perception also displayed an adaptation phenomenon. Adaptation was manifested as a per-stimulus decline in perceived tilt during prolonged stimulation and a reversal aftereffect upon return to zero acceleration (i.e., recentering the subject). We conclude that otolith inputs can produce tilt perception in the absence of canal stimulation, and that this perception is subject to an adaptation phenomenon and low-pass filtering of its otolith input.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-programmatic

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9551831     DOI: 10.1007/s002210050346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  28 in total

1.  Difference in the perception of the horizon during true and simulated tilt in the absence of semicircular canal cues.

Authors:  Jérôme Carriot; Pierre-Alain Barraud; Vincent Nougier; Corinne Cian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Roll rotation cues influence roll tilt perception assayed using a somatosensory technique.

Authors:  Sukyung Park; Claire Gianna-Poulin; F Owen Black; Scott Wood; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Vertical eye position responses to steady-state sinusoidal fore-aft head translation in monkeys.

Authors:  Yoshiro Wada; Yasushi Kodaka; Kenji Kawano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Tilt and translation motion perception during off-vertical axis rotation.

Authors:  Scott J Wood; Millard F Reschke; Laura A Sarmiento; Gilles Clément
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Whole-motion model of perception during forward- and backward-facing centrifuge runs.

Authors:  Jan E Holly; Arturs Vrublevskis; Lindsay E Carlson
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 6.  Computational approaches to spatial orientation: from transfer functions to dynamic Bayesian inference.

Authors:  Paul R MacNeilage; Narayan Ganesan; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Gravito-inertial ambiguity resolved through head stabilization.

Authors:  Ildar Farkhatdinov; Hannah Michalska; Alain Berthoz; Vincent Hayward
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 2.704

Review 8.  Computation of egomotion in the macaque cerebellar vermis.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; Tatyana A Yakusheva; Andrea M Green; J David Dickman; Pablo M Blazquez
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.847

9.  Frequency-selective coding of translation and tilt in macaque cerebellar nodulus and uvula.

Authors:  Tatyana Yakusheva; Pablo M Blazquez; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Phase-linking and the perceived motion during off-vertical axis rotation.

Authors:  Jan E Holly; Scott J Wood; Gin McCollum
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 2.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.