Literature DB >> 19937069

Phase-linking and the perceived motion during off-vertical axis rotation.

Jan E Holly1, Scott J Wood, Gin McCollum.   

Abstract

Human off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR) in the dark typically produces perceived motion about a cone, the amplitude of which changes as a function of frequency. This perception is commonly attributed to the fact that both the OVAR and the conical motion have a gravity vector that rotates about the subject. Little-known, however, is that this rotating-gravity explanation for perceived conical motion is inconsistent with basic observations about self-motion perception: (a) that the perceived vertical moves toward alignment with the gravito-inertial acceleration (GIA) and (b) that perceived translation arises from perceived linear acceleration, as derived from the portion of the GIA not associated with gravity. Mathematically proved in this article is the fact that during OVAR these properties imply mismatched phase of perceived tilt and translation, in contrast to the common perception of matched phases which correspond to conical motion with pivot at the bottom. This result demonstrates that an additional perceptual rule is required to explain perception in OVAR. This study investigates, both analytically and computationally, the phase relationship between tilt and translation at different stimulus rates-slow (45 degrees /s) and fast (180 degrees /s), and the three-dimensional shape of predicted perceived motion, under different sets of hypotheses about self-motion perception. We propose that for human motion perception, there is a phase-linking of tilt and translation movements to construct a perception of one's overall motion path. Alternative hypotheses to achieve the phase match were tested with three-dimensional computational models, comparing the output with published experimental reports. The best fit with experimental data was the hypothesis that the phase of perceived translation was linked to perceived tilt, while the perceived tilt was determined by the GIA. This hypothesis successfully predicted the bottom-pivot cone commonly reported and a reduced sense of tilt during fast OVAR. Similar considerations apply to the hilltop illusion often reported during horizontal linear oscillation. Known response properties of central neurons are consistent with this ability to phase-link translation with tilt. In addition, the competing "standard" model was mathematically proved to be unable to predict the bottom-pivot cone regardless of the values used for parameters in the model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19937069      PMCID: PMC2905236          DOI: 10.1007/s00422-009-0347-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


  95 in total

1.  Cognitive suppression of tilt sensations during linear horizontal self-motion in the dark.

Authors:  A H Wertheim; B S Mesland; W Bles
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Vestibular convergence patterns in vestibular nuclei neurons of alert primates.

Authors:  J David Dickman; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Patterns of human interlimb coordination emerge from the properties of non-linear, limit cycle oscillatory processes: theory and data.

Authors:  J A Kelso; K G Holt; P Rubin; P N Kugler
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  Neurons compute internal models of the physical laws of motion.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; Aasef G Shaikh; Andrea M Green; J David Dickman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Multiple sensory cues underlying the perception of translation and path.

Authors:  N Au Yong; G D Paige; S H Seidman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Synchronous bimanual movements performed by homologous and non-homologous muscles.

Authors:  L Cohen
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1971-04

7.  Modeling the vestibulo-ocular reflex of the squirrel monkey during eccentric rotation and roll tilt.

Authors:  D M Merfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Ocular torsion and tilt of subjective visual vertical are sensitive brainstem signs.

Authors:  M Dieterich; T Brandt
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 10.422

9.  Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans. II. Influence of the semicircular canals during eccentric rotation.

Authors:  D M Merfeld; L H Zupan; C A Gifford
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Eye movements evoked by proprioceptive stimulation along the body axis in humans.

Authors:  T Mergner; G Schweigart; F Botti; A Lehmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  5 in total

1.  Symmetries of a generic utricular projection: neural connectivity and the distribution of utricular information.

Authors:  Thomas Chartrand; Gin McCollum; Douglas A Hanes; Richard D Boyle
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Asymmetries and three-dimensional features of vestibular cross-coupled stimuli illuminated through modeling.

Authors:  Jan E Holly; M Arjumand Masood; Chiran S Bhandari
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 2.435

3.  Differences between perception and eye movements during complex motions.

Authors:  Jan E Holly; Saralin M Davis; Kelly E Sullivan
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.435

4.  Sensory conflict compared in microgravity, artificial gravity, motion sickness, and vestibular disorders.

Authors:  Jan E Holly; Sarah M Harmon
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Effects of motion paradigm on human perception of tilt and translation.

Authors:  Gilles Clément; Kara H Beaton; Millard F Reschke; Scott J Wood
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 4.996

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.