Literature DB >> 17565488

Tilt and translation motion perception during off-vertical axis rotation.

Scott J Wood1, Millard F Reschke, Laura A Sarmiento, Gilles Clément.   

Abstract

The effect of stimulus frequency on tilt and translation motion perception was studied during constant velocity off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR), and compared to the effect of stimulus frequency on eye movements. Fourteen healthy subjects were rotated in darkness about their longitudinal axis 10 degrees and 20 degrees off-vertical at 45 degrees /s (0.125 Hz) and 20 degrees off-vertical at 180 degrees /s (0.5 Hz). Perceived motion was evaluated using verbal reports and a joystick capable of recording tilt and translation in both sagittal and lateral planes. Eye movements were also recorded using videography. At the lower frequency, subjects reported the perception of progressing along the edge of a cone, whereas at the higher frequency they had the sensation of progressing along the edge of an upright cylinder. Tilt perception and ocular torsion significantly increased as the tilt angle increased from 10 degrees to 20 degrees at the lower frequency, and then decreased at the higher frequency. The phase lag of ocular torsion increased as a function of frequency, while the phase lag of tilt perception did not change. Horizontal eye movements were small at the lower frequency and showed a phase lead relative to the linear acceleration stimulus. While the phase lead of horizontal eye movements decreased at 0.5 Hz, the phase of translation perception did not vary with stimulus frequency and was similar to the phase of tilt perception during all conditions. A second data set was obtained in 12 subjects to compare motion perception phase when using a simple push-button to indicate nose-up orientation, continuous setting of pitch tilt alone, or continuous setting of tilt and translation in both pitch and roll planes as in the first data set. This set of measurements indicated that in the frequency range studied subjects tend to lead the stimulus when using a push-button task while lagging the stimulus when using a continuous setting of tilt with a joystick. Both amplitude and phase of tilt perception using the joystick were not different whether concentrating on pitch tilt alone or attempting a more complex reporting of tilt and translation in both sagittal and lateral planes. During dynamic linear stimuli in the absence of canal and visual input, a change in stimulus frequency alone elicits similar changes in the amplitude of both self-motion perception and eye movements. However, in contrast to the eye movements, the phase of both perceived tilt and translation motion is not altered by stimulus frequency over this limited range. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that neural processing to distinguish tilt and translation stimuli differs between eye movements and motion perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17565488     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-0994-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  55 in total

1.  Neurons compute internal models of the physical laws of motion.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; Aasef G Shaikh; Andrea M Green; J David Dickman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The dynamic contributions of the otolith organs to human ocular torsion.

Authors:  D M Merfeld; W Teiwes; A H Clarke; H Scherer; L R Young
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Tilt perception during dynamic linear acceleration.

Authors:  S H Seidman; L Telford; G D Paige
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Eye movements and motion perception induced by off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR) at small angles of tilt after spaceflight.

Authors:  G Clement; C Darlot; A Petropoulos; A Berthoz
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  Human otolith-ocular reflexes during off-vertical axis rotation: effect of frequency on tilt-translation ambiguity and motion sickness.

Authors:  Scott J Wood
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2002-04-19       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 6.  Vestibular syndromes in the roll plane: topographic diagnosis from brainstem to cortex.

Authors:  T Brandt; M Dieterich
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 10.422

7.  Effects of gravity on rotatory nystagmus in monkeys.

Authors:  T Raphan; B Cohen; V Henn
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Eye movements evoked by proprioceptive stimulation along the body axis in humans.

Authors:  T Mergner; G Schweigart; F Botti; A Lehmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Three-dimensional organization of otolith-ocular reflexes in rhesus monkeys. I. Linear acceleration responses during off-vertical axis rotation.

Authors:  D E Angelaki; B J Hess
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Eye movements induced by off-vertical axis rotation (OVAR) at small angles of tilt.

Authors:  C Darlot; P Denise; J Droulez; B Cohen; A Berthoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  18 in total

1.  Whole-motion model of perception during forward- and backward-facing centrifuge runs.

Authors:  Jan E Holly; Arturs Vrublevskis; Lindsay E Carlson
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.435

2.  Human discrimination of rotational velocities.

Authors:  Robert M Mallery; Osarenoma U Olomu; Rosalie M Uchanski; Valentin A Militchin; Timothy E Hullar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Perception of the dynamic visual vertical during sinusoidal linear motion.

Authors:  A Pomante; L P J Selen; W P Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Mathematical requirements of visual-vestibular integration.

Authors:  Douglas A Hanes
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  Dynamic characteristics of otolith ocular response during counter rotation about dual yaw axes in mice.

Authors:  N Shimizu; S Wood; K Kushiro; S Yanai; A Perachio; T Makishima
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Phase-linking and the perceived motion during off-vertical axis rotation.

Authors:  Jan E Holly; Scott J Wood; Gin McCollum
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  Neural representation of orientation relative to gravity in the macaque cerebellum.

Authors:  Jean Laurens; Hui Meng; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Sensory conflict compared in microgravity, artificial gravity, motion sickness, and vestibular disorders.

Authors:  Jan E Holly; Sarah M Harmon
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 2.435

9.  The role of GABAB receptors in the vestibular oculomotor system in mice.

Authors:  Naoki Shimizu; Scott Wood; Keisuke Kushiro; Adrian Perachio; Tomoko Makishima
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Retention of habituation of vestibulo-ocular reflex and sensation of rotation in humans.

Authors:  Gilles Clément; Caroline Tilikete; Jean-Hubert Courjon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.