Literature DB >> 21424258

Perceived tilt and translation during variable-radius swing motion with congruent or conflicting visual and vestibular cues.

Andrew A Rader1, Charles M Oman, Daniel M Merfeld.   

Abstract

We examined the influence of dynamic visual scenes on the motion perception of subjects undergoing sinusoidal (0.45 Hz) roll swing motion at different radii. The visual scenes were presented on a flatscreen monitor with a monocular 40° field of view. There were three categories of trials: (1) trials in the dark; (2) trials where the visual scene matched the actual motion; and (3) trials where the visual scene showed swing motion at a different radius. Subjects verbally reported perceptions of head tilt and translation. When the visual and vestibular cues differed, subjects reported perceptions that were geometrically consistent with a radius between the radii of the visual scene and the actual motion. Even when sensations did not match either the visual or vestibular stimuli, reported motion perceptions were consistent with swing motions combining elements of each. Subjects were generally unable to detect cue conflicts or judge their own visual-vestibular biases, which suggests that the visual and vestibular self-motion cues are not independently accessible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21424258      PMCID: PMC4074006          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2612-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  35 in total

1.  Cognitive suppression of tilt sensations during linear horizontal self-motion in the dark.

Authors:  A H Wertheim; B S Mesland; W Bles
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans. IV. Influence of visual rotational cues during roll optokinetic stimuli.

Authors:  L H Zupan; D M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  LABYRINTHINE FUNCTION RELATED TO EXPERIMENTS ON THE PARALLEL SWING. PROJECT MR005.13-6001, SUBTASK 1, REP NO. 86.

Authors:  F E GUEDRY; C S HARRIS
Journal:  Res Rep U S Nav Sch Aviat Med       Date:  1963-09-25

4.  Studies in space orientation; perception of the upright with displaced visual fields and with body tilted.

Authors:  S E ASCH; H A WITKIN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1948-08

5.  Fusion of visual and vestibular tilt cues in the perception of visual vertical.

Authors:  R A A Vingerhoets; M De Vrijer; J A M Van Gisbergen; W P Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The nature of the vestibular stimulus.

Authors:  L B W JONGKEES; J J GROEN
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1946-10       Impact factor: 1.469

7.  Human vestibuloocular reflex and its interactions with vision and fixation distance during linear and angular head movement.

Authors:  G D Paige; L Telford; S H Seidman; G R Barnes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Computation of inertial motion: neural strategies to resolve ambiguous otolith information.

Authors:  D E Angelaki; M Q McHenry; J D Dickman; S D Newlands; B J Hess
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Linear acceleration perception: frequency dependence of the hilltop illusion.

Authors:  S Glasauer
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1995

10.  Differences in influence between pitched-from-vertical lines and slanted-from-frontal horizontal lines on egocentric localization.

Authors:  W Li; L Matin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  Human perceptual overestimation of whole body roll tilt in hypergravity.

Authors:  Torin K Clark; Michael C Newman; Charles M Oman; Daniel M Merfeld; Laurence R Young
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  A review of human sensory dynamics for application to models of driver steering and speed control.

Authors:  Christopher J Nash; David J Cole; Robert S Bigler
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  Effects of motion paradigm on human perception of tilt and translation.

Authors:  Gilles Clément; Kara H Beaton; Millard F Reschke; Scott J Wood
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 4.996

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.