Literature DB >> 15730979

Vestibular perception and action employ qualitatively different mechanisms. II. VOR and perceptual responses during combined Tilt&Translation.

Daniel M Merfeld1, Sukyung Park, Claire Gianna-Poulin, F Owen Black, Scott Wood.   

Abstract

To compare and contrast the neural mechanisms that contribute to vestibular perception and action, we measured vestibuloocular reflexes (VOR) and perceptions of tilt and translation. We took advantage of the well-known ambiguity that the otolith organs respond to both linear acceleration and tilt with respect to gravity and investigated the mechanisms by which this ambiguity is resolved. A new motion paradigm that combined roll tilt with inter-aural translation ("Tilt&Translation") was used; subjects were sinusoidally (0.8 Hz) roll tilted but with their ears above or below the rotation axis. This paradigm provided sinusoidal roll canal cues that were the same across trials while providing otolith cues that varied linearly with ear position relative to the earth-horizontal rotation axis. We found that perceived tilt and translation depended on canal cues, with substantial roll tilt and inter-aural translation perceptions reported even when the otolith organs measured no inter-aural force. These findings match internal model predictions that rotational cues from the canals influence the neural processing of otolith cues. We also found horizontal translational VORs that varied linearly with radius; a minimal response was measured when the otolith organs transduced little or no inter-aural force. Hence, the horizontal translational VOR was dependent on otolith cues but independent of canal cues. These findings match predictions that translational VORs are elicited by simple filtering of otolith signals. We conclude that internal models govern human perception of tilt and translation at 0.8 Hz and that high-pass filtering governs the human translational VOR at this same frequency.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Neuroscience; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15730979     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00905.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  70 in total

1.  Frequency dependence of vestibuloocular reflex thresholds.

Authors:  Csilla Haburcakova; Richard F Lewis; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A distributed, dynamic, parallel computational model: the role of noise in velocity storage.

Authors:  Faisal Karmali; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Directional asymmetries and age effects in human self-motion perception.

Authors:  Rachel E Roditi; Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-03-09

4.  Role of cerebellum in motion perception and vestibulo-ocular reflex-similarities and disparities.

Authors:  Aasef G Shaikh; Antonella Palla; Sarah Marti; Itsaso Olasagasti; Lance M Optican; David S Zee; Dominik Straumann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Computerized dynamic posturography analysis of balance in individuals with a shoulder stabilization sling.

Authors:  D F Lui; A Memon; S Kwan; H Mullett
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  Perceived tilt and translation during variable-radius swing motion with congruent or conflicting visual and vestibular cues.

Authors:  Andrew A Rader; Charles M Oman; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Three-dimensional analysis of linear vestibulo-ocular reflex in humans during eccentric rotation while facing downwards.

Authors:  Takao Imai; Yasumitsu Takimoto; Noriaki Takeda; Tomoko Okumura; Hidenori Inohara
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The Impact of Oral Promethazine on Human Whole-Body Motion Perceptual Thresholds.

Authors:  Ana Diaz-Artiles; Adrian J Priesol; Torin K Clark; David P Sherwood; Charles M Oman; Laurence R Young; Faisal Karmali
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-24

9.  Effects of vestibular disorders on vestibular reflex and imagery.

Authors:  B S Cohen; J Provasi; P Leboucher; I Israël
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  Computation of egomotion in the macaque cerebellar vermis.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; Tatyana A Yakusheva; Andrea M Green; J David Dickman; Pablo M Blazquez
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.