Literature DB >> 16557415

Auditory steady-state responses and clinical applications.

Andrea Canale1, Michelangelo Lacilla, Andrea Luigi Cavalot, Roberto Albera.   

Abstract

The auditory steady-state responses to single continuous tones modulated in amplitude have been proposed as an alternative to objective frequency-specific audiometry. The aim of this study was to compare thresholds obtained by pure-tone audiometry (PTA) and by auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing or affected by hearing loss in adults and in order to evaluate the applicability of this objective test in no collaborative hearing-impaired subjects. Eleven people, 6 normal hearing and 5 with hearing loss, underwent PTA and multiple frequency auditory steady-state responses; simultaneous carrier tones (0.5, 1, 2 and 4 KHz) modulated in amplitude at different rates (77-105 Hz) were presented monaurally (TDH 49 earphones) at variable intensities (110-20 dB SPL). The mean threshold difference between PTA and multiple frequency auditory steady-state responses was 28 dB (standard deviation=14.2) and R correlation value at 0.5-1-2-4 kHz was 0.71 (P=0.0012) at the Pearson's test. These differences were significantly smaller considering the hearing-impaired separately (11.7 dB, standard deviation=2.9). The results of this study confirm previous reports showing that the multiple auditory steady-state response method is an accurate predictor of the behavioural audiogram in patients with sensory-neural hearing impairments and can be used as a valid support for behavioural evaluations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16557415     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-006-0017-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  11 in total

1.  Steady state responses to multiple amplitude-modulated tones: an optimized method to test frequency-specific thresholds in hearing-impaired children and normal-hearing subjects.

Authors:  M C Perez-Abalo; G Savio; A Torres; V Martín; E Rodríguez; L Galán
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Auditory steady-state response thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing impairments.

Authors:  Anthony T Herdman; David K Stapells
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 3.  Recording auditory steady-state responses in young infants.

Authors:  M Sasha John; David K Brown; Patricia J Muir; Terence W Picton
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  [Identification of the waveform of cortical auditory evoked potentials].

Authors:  R Albera; C Roberto; M Magnano; M Lacilla; B Morra; G Cortesina
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.124

5.  [Relations between pure-tone audiometry and cortical evoked auditory potentials].

Authors:  R Albera; G Canale; M Magnano; M Lacilla; B Morra; M G Rugiu; G Cortesina
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.124

6.  Auditory steady-state responses and word recognition scores in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults.

Authors:  Andrew Dimitrijevic; M Sasha John; Terence W Picton
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  A comparison of steady-state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans.

Authors:  L T Cohen; F W Rickards; G M Clark
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Objective evaluation of aided thresholds using auditory steady-state responses.

Authors:  T W Picton; A Durieux-Smith; S C Champagne; J Whittingham; L M Moran; C Giguère; Y Beauregard
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses.

Authors:  O G Lins; T W Picton; B L Boucher; A Durieux-Smith; S C Champagne; L M Moran; M C Perez-Abalo; V Martin; G Savio
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Hearing assessment by recording multiple auditory steady-state responses: the influence of test duration.

Authors:  Heleen Luts; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  8 in total

1.  Auditory steady-state responses for estimating moderate hearing loss.

Authors:  DeWet Swanepoel; Hettie Erasmus
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Relationship between pure tone audiometry and tone burst auditory brainstem response at low frequencies gated with Blackman window.

Authors:  Andrea Canale; Federico Dagna; Michelangelo Lacilla; Elena Piumetto; Roberto Albera
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Comparison of pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in subjects with normal hearing and hearing loss.

Authors:  Ali Ozdek; Mahmut Karacay; Guleser Saylam; Emel Tatar; Nurdan Aygener; Mehmet Hakan Korkmaz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Auditory steady-state response and auditory brainstem response thresholds in children.

Authors:  DeWet Swanepoel; Shamim Ebrahim
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Sensitivity and specificity of auditory steady-state response testing.

Authors:  Camila Maia Rabelo; Eliane Schochat
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

6.  COMPARISON OF HEARING THRESHOLD ESTIMATION USING AUDITORY STEADY STATE RESPONSES AND BRAINSTEM AUDITORY EVOKED POTENTIALS IN CHILDREN.

Authors:  Slobodanka Lemajić-Komazec; Zoran Komazec; Maja Buljčik Čupić; Saša Knežević; Oliver Vajs
Journal:  Acta Clin Croat       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 0.780

7.  Comparison of Auditory Steady-State Responses With Conventional Audiometry in Older Adults.

Authors:  Hadeel Y Tarawneh; Hamid R Sohrabi; Wilhelmina H A M Mulders; Ralph N Martins; Dona M P Jayakody
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.086

8.  Comparative study between pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing subjects.

Authors:  Roberto Miquelino de Oliveira Beck; Bernardo Faria Ramos; Signe Schuster Grasel; Henrique Faria Ramos; Maria Flávia Bonadia B de Moraes; Edigar Rezende de Almeida; Ricardo Ferreira Bento
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.