Literature DB >> 17487498

Auditory steady-state responses for estimating moderate hearing loss.

DeWet Swanepoel1, Hettie Erasmus.   

Abstract

The auditory steady-state response (ASSR) has gained popularity as an alternative technique for objective audiometry but its use in less severe degrees of hearing loss has been questioned. The aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness of the ASSR in estimating moderate degrees of hearing loss. Seven subjects (12 ears) with moderate sensorineural hearing loss between 15 and 18 years of age were enrolled in the study. Forty-eight behavioural and ASSR thresholds were obtained across the frequencies of 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz. ASSR thresholds were determined using a dichotic multiple frequency recording technique. Mean threshold differences varied between 2 and 8 dB (+/-7-10 dB SD) across frequencies. The highest difference and variability was recorded at 0.5 kHz. The frequencies 1-4 kHz also revealed significantly better correlations (0.74-0.88) compared to 0.5 kHz (0.31). Comparing correlation coefficients for behavioural thresholds less than 60 and 60 dB and higher revealed a significant difference. Eighty-six percent of ASSR thresholds corresponded within 5 dB of moderate to severe behavioural thresholds compared to only 29% for mild to moderate thresholds in this study. The results confirm that the ASSR can reliably estimate behavioural thresholds of 60 dB and higher, but due to increased variability, caution is recommended when estimating behavioural thresholds of less than 60 dB, especially at 0.5 kHz.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17487498     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-007-0327-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  15 in total

1.  Steady state responses to multiple amplitude-modulated tones: an optimized method to test frequency-specific thresholds in hearing-impaired children and normal-hearing subjects.

Authors:  M C Perez-Abalo; G Savio; A Torres; V Martín; E Rodríguez; L Galán
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Establishing normal hearing with the dichotic multiple-frequency auditory steady-state response compared to an auditory brainstem response protocol.

Authors:  Dewet Swanepoel; Dunay Schmulian; René Hugo
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.494

3.  Threshold prediction using the auditory steady-state response and the tone burst auditory brain stem response: a within-subject comparison.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses.

Authors:  O G Lins; T W Picton; B L Boucher; A Durieux-Smith; S C Champagne; L M Moran; M C Perez-Abalo; V Martin; G Savio
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Assessment of hearing in infants with moderate to profound impairment: the Melbourne experience with auditory steady-state evoked potential testing.

Authors:  Gary Rance; Robert J S Briggs
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2002-05

6.  The ASSR: clinical application in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired infants and adults, comparison with the click-evoked ABR and pure-tone audiometry.

Authors:  Fanny Scherf; Jan Brokx; Floris L Wuyts; Paul H Van de Heyning
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Auditory steady-state responses for children with severe to profound hearing loss.

Authors:  DeWet Swanepoel; René Hugo; Reinette Roode
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-05

8.  Auditory steady-state responses and clinical applications.

Authors:  Andrea Canale; Michelangelo Lacilla; Andrea Luigi Cavalot; Roberto Albera
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Short report: establishing normal hearing for infants with the auditory steady-state response.

Authors:  De Wet Swanepoel; Karen Steyn
Journal:  S Afr J Commun Disord       Date:  2005

Review 10.  Human auditory steady-state responses.

Authors:  Terence W Picton; M Sasha John; Andrew Dimitrijevic; David Purcell
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  6 in total

1.  Comparison of pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in subjects with normal hearing and hearing loss.

Authors:  Ali Ozdek; Mahmut Karacay; Guleser Saylam; Emel Tatar; Nurdan Aygener; Mehmet Hakan Korkmaz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Simultaneous acquisition of 40- and 80-Hz auditory steady-state responses for a direct comparison of response amplitude, residual noise and signal-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  Roland Mühler; Alexandra Petzke; Jesko L Verhey
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Relationship between behavioral hearing thresholds and estimated auditory steady-state response thresholds in children with a history of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia.

Authors:  Rasool Panahi; Zahra Jafari; Sara Hasani
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Auditory steady-state response and auditory brainstem response thresholds in children.

Authors:  DeWet Swanepoel; Shamim Ebrahim
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli in children with functional or sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Shin Kariya; Kunihiro Fukushima; Akihiro Kawasaki; Yuko Kataoka; Kazunori Nishizaki
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Fast hearing-threshold estimation using multiple auditory steady-state responses with narrow-band chirps and adaptive stimulus patterns.

Authors:  Roland Mühler; Katrin Mentzel; Jesko Verhey
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.