Literature DB >> 8698162

Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses.

O G Lins1, T W Picton, B L Boucher, A Durieux-Smith, S C Champagne, L M Moran, M C Perez-Abalo, V Martin, G Savio.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the audiometric usefulness of steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous tones, amplitude-modulated at 75 to 110 Hz.
DESIGN: Steady-state responses to multiple tones amplitude-modulated at different rates between 75 and 110 Hz and presented simultaneously were recorded at different intensities in normal adults, well babies, normal adults with simulated hearing loss, and adolescents with known hearing losses. Response thresholds were compared with behavioral thresholds.
RESULTS: In normal adults the thresholds for steady-state responses to tones of 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz were 14 +/- 11, 12 +/- 11, 11 +/- 8, and 13 +/- 11 dB, respectively, above behavioral thresholds for air-conducted stimuli, and 11 +/- 5, 14 +/- 8, 9 +/- 8, and 10 +/- 10 dB above behavioral thresholds for bone-conducted stimuli. In well babies tested in a quiet environment, the thresholds were 45 +/- 13, 29 +/- 10, 26 +/- 8, and 29 +/- 10 dB SPL. In adolescents with known hearing losses, the steady-state responses thresholds predict behavioral thresholds with correlation coefficients (r) of 0.72, 0.70, 0.76, and 0.91 at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Steady-state responses to tone amplitude-modulated at 75 to 110 Hz can be used for frequency-specific objective audiometry. The multiple-stimulus technique allows thresholds to be estimated for eight different stimuli at the same time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8698162     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199604000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  39 in total

1.  [Auditory steady-state response. On the threshold of clinical usage?].

Authors:  R Mühler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Auditory steady-state responses for estimating moderate hearing loss.

Authors:  DeWet Swanepoel; Hettie Erasmus
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  [Acoustic evoked potentials. The nomenclature in terminological transition].

Authors:  I Baljić; M Walger
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Relationship between pure tone audiometry and tone burst auditory brainstem response at low frequencies gated with Blackman window.

Authors:  Andrea Canale; Federico Dagna; Michelangelo Lacilla; Elena Piumetto; Roberto Albera
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Electrically evoked auditory steady state responses in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Michael Hofmann; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-12-22

6.  Comparison of pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in subjects with normal hearing and hearing loss.

Authors:  Ali Ozdek; Mahmut Karacay; Guleser Saylam; Emel Tatar; Nurdan Aygener; Mehmet Hakan Korkmaz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 7.  Evidence against attentional state modulating scalp-recorded auditory brainstem steady-state responses.

Authors:  Leonard Varghese; Hari M Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Rapid acquisition of auditory subcortical steady state responses using multichannel recordings.

Authors:  Hari M Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Relationship between behavioral hearing thresholds and estimated auditory steady-state response thresholds in children with a history of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia.

Authors:  Rasool Panahi; Zahra Jafari; Sara Hasani
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Auditory steady-state response and auditory brainstem response thresholds in children.

Authors:  DeWet Swanepoel; Shamim Ebrahim
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.