Literature DB >> 15604915

Recording auditory steady-state responses in young infants.

M Sasha John1, David K Brown, Patricia J Muir, Terence W Picton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the auditory steady-state responses evoked by amplitude-modulated (AM), mixed-modulated (MM), exponentially-modulated (AM2), and frequency-modulated (FM) tones in 50 newborn infants (within 3 days of birth) and in 20 older infants (within 3-15 wk of birth). Our hypothesis was that MM and AM2 tonal stimuli would evoke larger responses than either the AM or FM tones, and that this increased size would make the responses more readily detectable.
DESIGN: Multiple auditory steady-state responses were recorded to four tonal stimuli presented simultaneously to each ear at 50 dB SPL. The carrier frequencies of the stimuli were 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz and the modulation rates were between 78 and 95 Hz. Recordings lasting 12 minutes were obtained for each of the three types of modulation: 100% AM, MM (100% AM and 20% FM) and AM2. In six infants, responses to 20% FM were also recorded.
RESULTS: In newborn infants, MM and AM2 stimuli produced responses that were on average 15% larger than AM stimuli. For AM, MM, and AM2 stimuli, the percentage of significant responses was 67%, 73%, 76%, respectively. Responses to FM stimuli were clearly evident in newborn infants and were about half the amplitude of the AM responses. Responses recorded in the older infants were 17% larger when evoked by MM and AM2 stimuli, rather than AM stimuli. Responses in the older infants were, on average, 32% larger and showed a higher incidence of significant responses than for infants in the first 3 days of life. For AM, MM, and AM2 stimuli, the percentage of significant responses was 82%, 82%, 84%, respectively. In both newborn and older infants, the overall percentage of significant responses was decreased by the 500 Hz results, which showed lower amplitudes and were less frequently detected than responses evoked by other frequencies.
CONCLUSIONS: The responses to MM and AM2 tones were larger than those evoked by AM tones. Using these stimuli will increase the reliability and efficiency of evoked potential audiometry in infancy. Responses at 50 dB SPL are more easily detected at 3-15 wk of age than in the first few days after birth. Comprehensive frequency-specific testing of hearing using steady-state responses will likely be more accurate if postponed until after the immediate neonatal period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15604915     DOI: 10.1097/01.aud.0000148050.80749.ac

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  13 in total

1.  [Auditory steady-state response. On the threshold of clinical usage?].

Authors:  R Mühler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Audiometric thresholds estimated by auditory steady-state responses. Influence of EEG amplitude and test duration on accuracy].

Authors:  R Mühler; T Rahne
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Relationship between pure tone audiometry and tone burst auditory brainstem response at low frequencies gated with Blackman window.

Authors:  Andrea Canale; Federico Dagna; Michelangelo Lacilla; Elena Piumetto; Roberto Albera
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  An exploratory look at pediatric cochlear implantation: is earliest always best?

Authors:  Rachael Frush Holt; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Assessment of low-frequency hearing with narrow-band chirp-evoked 40-Hz sinusoidal auditory steady-state response.

Authors:  Uzma S Wilson; Wafaa A Kaf; Ali A Danesh; Jeffery T Lichtenhan
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Auditory steady-state responses and clinical applications.

Authors:  Andrea Canale; Michelangelo Lacilla; Andrea Luigi Cavalot; Roberto Albera
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Auditory steady-state responses in school-aged children: a pilot study.

Authors:  Luciana Macedo de Resende; Sirley Alves da Silva Carvalho; Thamara Suzi Dos Santos; Filipe Ibraim Abdo; Matheus Romão; Marcela Cristina Ferreira; Carlos Julio Tierra-Criollo
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Human neuromagnetic steady-state responses to amplitude-modulated tones, speech, and music.

Authors:  Satu Lamminmäki; Lauri Parkkonen; Riitta Hari
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  On the Cost of Introducing Speech-Like Properties to a Stimulus for Auditory Steady-State Response Measurements.

Authors:  Søren Laugesen; Julia Eva Rieck; Claus Elberling; Torsten Dau; James M Harte
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Estimation of auditory steady-state responses based on the averaging of independent EEG epochs.

Authors:  Pavel Prado-Gutierrez; Eduardo Martínez-Montes; Alejandro Weinstein; Matías Zañartu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.