Literature DB >> 21814732

Relationship between pure tone audiometry and tone burst auditory brainstem response at low frequencies gated with Blackman window.

Andrea Canale1, Federico Dagna, Michelangelo Lacilla, Elena Piumetto, Roberto Albera.   

Abstract

To assess the reliability of Blackman windowed tone burst auditory brainstem response (ABR) as a predictor of hearing threshold at low frequencies. Fifty-six subjects were divided in to three groups (normal hearing, conductive hearing loss, sensorineural hearing loss) after pure tone audiometry (PTA) testing. Then they underwent tone burst ABR using Blackman windowed stimuli at 0.5 kHz and 1 kHz. Results were compared with PTA threshold. Mean threshold differences between PTA and ABR ranged between 11 dB at 0.5 kHz and 14 dB at 1 kHz. ABR threshold was worse than PTA in each but 2 cases. Mean discrepancy between the two thresholds was about 20 dB in normal hearing, reducing in presence of hearing loss, without any differences in conductive and sensorineural cases. Tone burst ABR is a good predictor of hearing threshold at low frequencies, in case of suspected hearing loss. Further studies are recommended to evaluate an ipsilateral masking such as notched noise to ensure greater frequency specificity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21814732     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-011-1723-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  15 in total

1.  Steady state responses to multiple amplitude-modulated tones: an optimized method to test frequency-specific thresholds in hearing-impaired children and normal-hearing subjects.

Authors:  M C Perez-Abalo; G Savio; A Torres; V Martín; E Rodríguez; L Galán
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Thresholds for short-latency auditory-evoked potentials to tones in notched noise in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.

Authors:  D R Stapells; T W Picton; A Durieux-Smith; C G Edwards; L M Moran
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1990

3.  Threshold prediction using the auditory steady-state response and the tone burst auditory brain stem response: a within-subject comparison.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Auditory steady-state responses and word recognition scores in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired adults.

Authors:  Andrew Dimitrijevic; M Sasha John; Terence W Picton
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Objective evaluation of aided thresholds using auditory steady-state responses.

Authors:  T W Picton; A Durieux-Smith; S C Champagne; J Whittingham; L M Moran; C Giguère; Y Beauregard
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses.

Authors:  O G Lins; T W Picton; B L Boucher; A Durieux-Smith; S C Champagne; L M Moran; M C Perez-Abalo; V Martin; G Savio
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Acoustic brainstem responses for clinical use: a comparison of pure tone stimuli with wide band clicks.

Authors:  A E Davis; S Barnard; H A Beagley
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1985-10

8.  Thresholds for auditory brain stem responses to tones in notched noise from infants and young children with normal hearing or sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  D R Stapells; J S Gravel; B A Martin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Auditory steady-state responses and clinical applications.

Authors:  Andrea Canale; Michelangelo Lacilla; Andrea Luigi Cavalot; Roberto Albera
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  ABR thresholds to tonebursts gated with Blackman and linear windows in adults with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Suzanne C Purdy; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  [Intraoperative monitoring of cochlear nerve function during cerebello-pontine angle surgery].

Authors:  S Rampp; T Rahne; S K Plontke; C Strauss; J Prell
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  Intra-operative hearing monitoring methods in middle ear surgeries.

Authors:  Wei Ren; Fei Ji; Jialing Zeng; Hui Zhao
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2017-02-08

3.  The Effects of Random Stimulation Rate on Measurements of Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Mingxing Zhu; Oluwarotimi Williams Samuel; Xiaochen Wang; Haoshi Zhang; Junjie Yao; Yun Lu; Mingjiang Wang; Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay; Wanqing Wu; Shixiong Chen; Guanglin Li
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.169

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.