Literature DB >> 1774415

A comparison of steady-state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans.

L T Cohen1, F W Rickards, G M Clark.   

Abstract

Steady-state evoked potential responses were measured to binaural amplitude-modulated (AM) and combined amplitude- and frequency-modulated (AM/FM) tones. For awake subjects, AM/FM tones produced larger amplitude responses than did AM tones. Awake and sleeping responses to 30-dB HL AM/FM tones were compared. Response amplitudes were lower during sleep and the extent to which they differed from awake amplitudes was dependent on both carrier and modulation frequencies. Background EEG noise at the stimulus modulation frequency was also reduced during sleep and varied with modulation frequency. A detection efficiency function was used to indicate the modulation frequencies likely to be most suitable for electrical estimation of behavioral threshold. In awake subjects, for all carrier frequencies tested, detection efficiency was highest at a modulation frequency of 45 Hz. In sleeping subjects, the modulation frequency regions of highest efficiency varied with carrier frequency. For carrier frequencies of 250 Hz, 500 Hz, and 1 kHz, the highest efficiencies were found in two modulation frequency regions centered on 45 and 90 Hz. For 2 and 4 kHz, the highest efficiencies were at modulation frequencies above 70 Hz. Sleep stage affected both response amplitude and background EEG noise in a manner that depended on modulation frequency. The results of this study suggest that, for sleeping subjects, modulation frequencies above 70 Hz may be best when using steady-state potentials for hearing threshold estimation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1774415     DOI: 10.1121/1.402050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  28 in total

1.  Using the auditory steady state response to record response amplitude curves. A possible fast objective method for diagnosing dead regions.

Authors:  Timothy Wilding; Colette McKay; Richard Baker; Terence Picton; Karolina Kluk
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Improved electrically evoked auditory steady-state response thresholds in humans.

Authors:  Michael Hofmann; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-05-09

3.  Electrically evoked auditory steady state responses in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Michael Hofmann; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-12-22

4.  Frequency characteristics of contralateral sound suppression of 40-Hz auditory steady-state response.

Authors:  Hiromichi Kiyokawa; Tetsuaki Kawase; Hidetoshi Oshima; Atsuko Maki; Toshimitsu Kobayashi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  Evidence against attentional state modulating scalp-recorded auditory brainstem steady-state responses.

Authors:  Leonard Varghese; Hari M Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Tone-evoked brainstem responses and auditory steady state responses to 40hz and 80hz amplitude modulated stimuli with different frequencies - a comparative study.

Authors:  Kaushlendra Kumar; Sujeet Kumar Sinha; Jayashree S Bhat
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-07-23

7.  Human Envelope Following Responses to Amplitude Modulation: Effects of Aging and Modulation Depth.

Authors:  Andrew Dimitrijevic; Jamal Alsamri; M Sasha John; David Purcell; Sahara George; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Rapid acquisition of auditory subcortical steady state responses using multichannel recordings.

Authors:  Hari M Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  The amplitude and phase precision of 40 Hz auditory steady-state response depend on the level of arousal.

Authors:  Inga Griskova; Morten Morup; Josef Parnas; Osvaldas Ruksenas; Sidse M Arnfred
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Assessment of low-frequency hearing with narrow-band chirp-evoked 40-Hz sinusoidal auditory steady-state response.

Authors:  Uzma S Wilson; Wafaa A Kaf; Ali A Danesh; Jeffery T Lichtenhan
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.