Literature DB >> 19536554

Comparison of pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in subjects with normal hearing and hearing loss.

Ali Ozdek1, Mahmut Karacay, Guleser Saylam, Emel Tatar, Nurdan Aygener, Mehmet Hakan Korkmaz.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to compare pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state response (ASSR) thresholds in normal hearing (NH) subjects and subjects with hearing loss. This study involved 23 NH adults and 38 adults with hearing loss (HI). After detection of behavioral thresholds (BHT) with pure tone audiometry, each subject was tested for ASSR responses in the same day. Only one ear was tested for each subject. The mean pure tone average was 9 ± 4 dB for NH group and 57 ± 14 for HI group. There was a very strong correlation between BHT and ASSR measurements in HI group. However, the correlation was weaker in the NH group. The mean differences of pure tone average of four frequencies (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz) and ASSR threshold average of same frequencies were 13 ± 6 dB in NH group and 7 ± 5 dB in HI group and the difference was significant (P = 0.01). It was found that 86% of threshold difference values were less than 20 dB in NH group and 92% of threshold difference values were less than 20 dB in HI group. In conclusion, ASSR thresholds can be used to predict the configuration of pure tone audiometry. Results are more accurate in HI group than NH group. Although ASSR can be used in cochlear implant decision-making process, findings do not permit the utilization of the test for medico-legal reasons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19536554     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-009-1014-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  21 in total

1.  Steady state responses to multiple amplitude-modulated tones: an optimized method to test frequency-specific thresholds in hearing-impaired children and normal-hearing subjects.

Authors:  M C Perez-Abalo; G Savio; A Torres; V Martín; E Rodríguez; L Galán
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Auditory steady-state response thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing impairments.

Authors:  Anthony T Herdman; David K Stapells
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Threshold prediction using the auditory steady-state response and the tone burst auditory brain stem response: a within-subject comparison.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Comparison of MASTER and AUDERA for measurement of auditory steady-state responses.

Authors:  Heleen Luts; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Cochlear implantation in deaf infants.

Authors:  Richard T Miyamoto; Derek M Houston; Tonya Bergeson
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses.

Authors:  O G Lins; T W Picton; B L Boucher; A Durieux-Smith; S C Champagne; L M Moran; M C Perez-Abalo; V Martin; G Savio
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  The inadequacy of click-evoked auditory brainstem responses in audiological applications.

Authors:  J J Eggermont
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Prediction of hearing threshold in infants using auditory steady-state evoked potentials.

Authors:  Gary Rance; Field Rickards
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss.

Authors:  C Yoshinaga-Itano; A L Sedey; D K Coulter; A L Mehl
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Auditory steady-state responses for children with severe to profound hearing loss.

Authors:  DeWet Swanepoel; René Hugo; Reinette Roode
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-05
View more
  9 in total

1.  Validity of correction factors applied to auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) in normal hearing adults in chartr EP system.

Authors:  Zahra Ghasemahmad; Saeid Farahani
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Simultaneous acquisition of 40- and 80-Hz auditory steady-state responses for a direct comparison of response amplitude, residual noise and signal-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  Roland Mühler; Alexandra Petzke; Jesko L Verhey
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Hearing threshold estimation by auditory steady-state responses with narrow-band chirps and adaptive stimulus patterns: implementation in clinical routine.

Authors:  David Ulrich Seidel; Tobias Angelo Flemming; Jonas Jae-Hyun Park; Stephan Remmert
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Hearing threshold prediction with Auditory Steady State Responses and estimation of correction functions to compensate for differences with behavioral data, in adult subjects. Part 1: Audera and CHARTR EP devices.

Authors:  Stavros Hatzopoulos; Joseph Petruccelli; Lech Śliwa; Wiesław W Jędrzejczak; Krzysztof Kochanek; Henryk Skarżyński
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2012-07

5.  Effect of hearing aids on auditory function in infants with perinatal brain injury and severe hearing loss.

Authors:  Alma Janeth Moreno-Aguirre; Efraín Santiago-Rodríguez; Thalía Harmony; Antonio Fernández-Bouzas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Fast hearing-threshold estimation using multiple auditory steady-state responses with narrow-band chirps and adaptive stimulus patterns.

Authors:  Roland Mühler; Katrin Mentzel; Jesko Verhey
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-04-24

7.  Comparison of auditory brainstem response and auditory steady state response audiometry by evaluating the hearing thresholds obtained in children with different severity of hearing loss.

Authors:  Muhammad Azeem Aslam; Adeela Javed; Abdul Moiz
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

8.  Comparison of Auditory Steady-State Responses With Conventional Audiometry in Older Adults.

Authors:  Hadeel Y Tarawneh; Hamid R Sohrabi; Wilhelmina H A M Mulders; Ralph N Martins; Dona M P Jayakody
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.086

9.  Auditory steady-state response thresholds in adults with conductive and mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Reza Hosseinabadi; Sadegh Jafarzadeh
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 0.611

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.