Literature DB >> 11409856

Steady state responses to multiple amplitude-modulated tones: an optimized method to test frequency-specific thresholds in hearing-impaired children and normal-hearing subjects.

M C Perez-Abalo1, G Savio, A Torres, V Martín, E Rodríguez, L Galán.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate, using statistical methods, the usefulness of the binaural multiple frequency auditory steady state responses (MF SSRs) for objective, frequency-specific audiometry in a large sample of hearing-impaired children and normal-hearing subjects.
DESIGN: The MF SSRs were recorded in a sample of 43 hearing-impaired children (86 ears) and 40 normal-hearing young adults (80 ears). Simultaneous carrier tones (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz) modulated in amplitude at different rates (77 to 105 Hz) were presented binaurally (TDH 49 earphones) at variable intensities (110 to 20 dB SPL). For each subject the response thresholds (RTHs) at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz, were determined automatically (F test) and compared with the corresponding behavioral thresholds (BTHs).
RESULTS: In the normal-hearing subjects, RTHs were detectable, on average, between 11 and 15 dB above the BTH. These differences were significantly smaller in the hearing-impaired (5 to 13 dB). Also a close correspondence was found between the subjective and objective audiogram curves in both groups. The within subject Spearman correlation coefficients calculated between the two curves, were in most cases above the significance cut off point (p < 0.05). Also in 1-way repeated measures analysis of variance, the overall error in the estimation of the audiogram (vector across frequency of absolute distances between the curves) did not differ significantly from zero.
CONCLUSIONS: The binaural MF SSR was proven to be a valid technique for the estimation of an objective audiogram, in a large sample of hearing-impaired children and normal-hearing subjects. With this method, frequency-specific thresholds at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz could be determined in all subjects (and both ears) with no appreciable loss in accuracy and a considerable reduction in testing time (average recording time = 21 minutes) when compared with other frequency-specific techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11409856     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200106000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  15 in total

1.  [Auditory steady-state response. On the threshold of clinical usage?].

Authors:  R Mühler
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Auditory steady-state responses for estimating moderate hearing loss.

Authors:  DeWet Swanepoel; Hettie Erasmus
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Relationship between pure tone audiometry and tone burst auditory brainstem response at low frequencies gated with Blackman window.

Authors:  Andrea Canale; Federico Dagna; Michelangelo Lacilla; Elena Piumetto; Roberto Albera
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Comparison of pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in subjects with normal hearing and hearing loss.

Authors:  Ali Ozdek; Mahmut Karacay; Guleser Saylam; Emel Tatar; Nurdan Aygener; Mehmet Hakan Korkmaz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Longitudinal assessment of air conduction audiograms in a phase III clinical trial of difluoromethylornithine and sulindac for prevention of sporadic colorectal adenomas.

Authors:  Christine E McLaren; Sharon Fujikawa-Brooks; Wen-Pin Chen; Daniel L Gillen; Daniel Pelot; Eugene W Gerner; Frank L Meyskens
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2008-12

6.  [Steady-state responses of the auditory system: a comparison of different methods].

Authors:  S Liebler; S Hoth; P K Plinkert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Auditory steady-state responses and clinical applications.

Authors:  Andrea Canale; Michelangelo Lacilla; Andrea Luigi Cavalot; Roberto Albera
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-03-24       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Effect of hearing aids on auditory function in infants with perinatal brain injury and severe hearing loss.

Authors:  Alma Janeth Moreno-Aguirre; Efraín Santiago-Rodríguez; Thalía Harmony; Antonio Fernández-Bouzas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  COMPARISON OF HEARING THRESHOLD ESTIMATION USING AUDITORY STEADY STATE RESPONSES AND BRAINSTEM AUDITORY EVOKED POTENTIALS IN CHILDREN.

Authors:  Slobodanka Lemajić-Komazec; Zoran Komazec; Maja Buljčik Čupić; Saša Knežević; Oliver Vajs
Journal:  Acta Clin Croat       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 0.780

10.  Habituation of Auditory Steady State Responses Evoked by Amplitude-Modulated Acoustic Signals in Rats.

Authors:  Pavel Prado-Gutierrez; Anisleidy Castro-Fariñas; Lisbet Morgado-Rodriguez; Ernesto Velarde-Reyes; Agustín D Martínez; Eduardo Martínez-Montes
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2015-01-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.