Literature DB >> 16454299

Level dependence of auditory filters in nonsimultaneous masking as a function of frequency.

Andrew J Oxenham1, Andrea M Simonson.   

Abstract

Auditory filter bandwidths were measured using nonsimultaneous masking, as a function of signal level between 10 and 35 dB SL for signal frequencies of 1, 2, 4, and 6 kHz. The brief sinusoidal signal was presented in a temporal gap within a spectrally notched noise. Two groups of normal-hearing subjects were tested, one using a fixed masker level and adaptively varying signal level, the other using a fixed signal level and adaptively varying masker level. In both cases, auditory filters were derived by assuming a constant filter shape for a given signal level. The filter parameters derived from the two paradigms were not significantly different. At 1 kHz, the equivalent rectangular bandwidth (ERB) decreased as the signal level increased from 10 to 20 dB SL, after which it remained roughly constant. In contrast, at 6 kHz, the ERB increased consistently with signal levels from 10 to 35 dB SL. The results at 2 and 4 kHz were intermediate, showing no consistent change in ERB with signal level. Overall, the results suggest changes in the level dependence of the auditory filters at frequencies above 1 kHz that are not currently incorporated in models of human auditory filter tuning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16454299      PMCID: PMC1752201          DOI: 10.1121/1.2141359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  46 in total

1.  Auditory-nerve-fiber responses to high-level clicks: interference patterns indicate that excitation is due to the combination of multiple drives.

Authors:  T Lin; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Frequency selectivity as a function of level and frequency measured with uniformly exciting notched noise.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory filter bandwidths as a function of level at low frequencies (125 Hz-1 kHz)

Authors:  S Rosen; D Stock
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Effects of stimulus level on forward-masked psychophysical tuning curves in quiet and in noise.

Authors:  D A Nelson; S J Chargo; J G Kopun; R L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Two-tone rate suppression in auditory-nerve fibers: dependence on suppressor frequency and level.

Authors:  B Delgutte
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Additivity of masking in normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.

Authors:  A J Oxenham; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Nonlinear mechanics at the apex of the guinea-pig cochlea.

Authors:  N P Cooper; W S Rhode
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Characterising auditory filter nonlinearity.

Authors:  S Rosen; R J Baker
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  High-level psychophysical tuning curves: forward masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  D A Nelson
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1991-12
View more
  13 in total

1.  Isoresponse versus isoinput estimates of cochlear filter tuning.

Authors:  Almudena Eustaquio-Martín; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-23

2.  Evaluating the effects of olivocochlear feedback on psychophysical measures of frequency selectivity.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Frequency selectivity in macaque monkeys measured using a notched-noise method.

Authors:  Jane A Burton; Margit E Dylla; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Congenital amusia: a cognitive disorder limited to resolved harmonics and with no peripheral basis.

Authors:  Marion Cousineau; Andrew J Oxenham; Isabelle Peretz
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Loudness and pitch perception using Dynamically Compensated Virtual Channels.

Authors:  Waldo Nogueira; Leonid M Litvak; David M Landsberger; Andreas Büchner
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Auditory filter tuning inferred with short sinusoidal and notched-noise maskers.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Rapid measurement of auditory filter shape in mice using the auditory brainstem response and notched noise.

Authors:  Ioan A Lina; Amanda M Lauer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  On the controversy about the sharpness of human cochlear tuning.

Authors:  Enrique A Lopez-Poveda; Almudena Eustaquio-Martin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-21

9.  Auditory nerve frequency tuning measured with forward-masked compound action potentials.

Authors:  Eric Verschooten; Luis Robles; Damir Kovačić; Philip X Joris
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-05

10.  The role of excitation-pattern cues in the detection of frequency shifts in bandpass-filtered complex tones.

Authors:  Frederic Marmel; Christopher J Plack; Kathryn Hopkins; Robert P Carlyon; Hedwig E Gockel; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.