Literature DB >> 23347916

Rapid measurement of auditory filter shape in mice using the auditory brainstem response and notched noise.

Ioan A Lina1, Amanda M Lauer.   

Abstract

The notched noise method is an effective procedure for measuring frequency resolution and auditory filter shapes in both human and animal models of hearing. Briefly, auditory filter shape and bandwidth estimates are derived from masked thresholds for tones presented in noise containing widening spectral notches. As the spectral notch widens, increasingly less of the noise falls within the auditory filter and the tone becomes more detectible until the notch width exceeds the filter bandwidth. Behavioral procedures have been used for the derivation of notched noise auditory filter shapes in mice; however, the time and effort needed to train and test animals on these tasks renders a constraint on the widespread application of this testing method. As an alternative procedure, we combined relatively non-invasive auditory brainstem response (ABR) measurements and the notched noise method to estimate auditory filters in normal-hearing mice at center frequencies of 8, 11.2, and 16 kHz. A complete set of simultaneous masked thresholds for a particular tone frequency were obtained in about an hour. ABR-derived filter bandwidths broadened with increasing frequency, consistent with previous studies. The ABR notched noise procedure provides a fast alternative to estimating frequency selectivity in mice that is well-suited to high through-put or time-sensitive screening.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23347916      PMCID: PMC3639490          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  46 in total

1.  Frequency selectivity as a function of level and frequency measured with uniformly exciting notched noise.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Growth of masking and the auditory filter.

Authors:  D L Weber
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Frequency selectivity in Old-World monkeys corroborates sharp cochlear tuning in humans.

Authors:  Philip X Joris; Christopher Bergevin; Radha Kalluri; Myles Mc Laughlin; Pascal Michelet; Marcel van der Heijden; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Auditory filter shape.

Authors:  R D Patterson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Auditory filter shapes in forward masking as a function of level.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Psychophysical tuning curves independent of signal level.

Authors:  D M Green; B R Shelton; M C Picardi; E R Hafter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The deterioration of hearing with age: frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold.

Authors:  R D Patterson; I Nimmo-Smith; D L Weber; R Milroy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Behavioral investigation of some possible effects of the central olivocochlear pathways in transgenic mice.

Authors:  Bradford J May; Cynthia A Prosen; Donna Weiss; Douglas Vetter
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Auditory filter shapes for the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) and the white whale (Delphinapterus leucas) derived with notched noise.

Authors:  James J Finneran; Carolyn E Schlundt; Donald A Carder; Sam H Ridgway
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  14 in total

1.  The Pex1-G844D mouse: a model for mild human Zellweger spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Shandi Hiebler; Tomohiro Masuda; Joseph G Hacia; Ann B Moser; Phyllis L Faust; Anita Liu; Nivedita Chowdhury; Ning Huang; Amanda Lauer; Jean Bennett; Paul A Watkins; Donald J Zack; Nancy E Braverman; Gerald V Raymond; Steven J Steinberg
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 4.797

2.  Auditory nerve synapses persist in ventral cochlear nucleus long after loss of acoustic input in mice with early-onset progressive hearing loss.

Authors:  Brian McGuire; Benjamin Fiorillo; David K Ryugo; Amanda M Lauer
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Mice tune out not in: violation of prediction drives auditory saliency.

Authors:  Meike M Rogalla; Inga Rauser; Karsten Schulze; Lasse Osterhagen; K Jannis Hildebrandt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Culture and properties of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells: characteristics in vitro and immunosuppression in vivo.

Authors:  Fujiang Cao; Tao Liu; Yunqiang Xu; Dongdong Xu; Shiqing Feng
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-07-01

5.  The role of harmonic resolvability in pitch perception in a vocal nonhuman primate, the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Michael S Osmanski; Xindong Song; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Minimal Effects of Age and Exposure to a Noisy Environment on Hearing in Alpha9 Nicotinic Receptor Knockout Mice.

Authors:  Amanda M Lauer
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Adaptation and spectral enhancement at auditory temporal perceptual boundaries - Measurements via temporal precision of auditory brainstem responses.

Authors:  Diana B Geissler; Elke Weiler; Günter Ehret
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Up-regulation of autophagy and apoptosis of cochlear hair cells in mouse models for deafness.

Authors:  Fei-Long Xu; Yanjie Cheng; Wenya Yan
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.318

9.  Long non‑coding RNA EBLN3P promotes the recovery of the function of impaired spiral ganglion neurons by competitively binding to miR‑204‑5p and regulating TMPRSS3 expression.

Authors:  Wenqi Jiang; Anquan Peng; Yichao Chen; Bo Pang; Zhiwen Zhang
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 4.101

10.  Sound exposure dynamically induces dopamine synthesis in cholinergic LOC efferents for feedback to auditory nerve fibers.

Authors:  Jingjing Sherry Wu; Eunyoung Yi; Marco Manca; Hamad Javaid; Amanda M Lauer; Elisabeth Glowatzki
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.