Literature DB >> 8188552

Characterising auditory filter nonlinearity.

S Rosen1, R J Baker.   

Abstract

An important aspect of auditory nonlinearity is that psychoacoustically measured auditory filters broaden as the level at which they are measured increases. However, it is not yet clear whether the change in filter shape is controlled primarily by the level of the probe or that of the masker. We have therefore developed a new method for fitting filter shapes to notched-noise data in which filter parameters depend explicitly on signal level (either probe or masker). By applying this technique to a set of notched-noise data in which both fixed-probe and fixed-masker paradigms have been used at a range of levels, we have been able to show that models in which filter parameters depend on probe level are considerably more successful than models in which filter parameters depend upon masker level. The results from this new procedure have enabled us to describe the nonlinear changes in auditory filter shape at 2 kHz with only five parameters. Also discussed are the implications of these findings for the generation of excitation patterns and for the computational implementation of simple, yet reasonably realistic nonlinear auditory filters whose shape depends on their output.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8188552     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(94)90239-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  22 in total

1.  Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-07-10

2.  Isoresponse versus isoinput estimates of cochlear filter tuning.

Authors:  Almudena Eustaquio-Martín; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-23

3.  Auditory-filter characteristics for listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-03

4.  Psychophysical estimates of nonlinear cochlear processing in younger and older listeners.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Level dependence of auditory filters in nonsimultaneous masking as a function of frequency.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Andrea M Simonson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Bayesian adaptive estimation of the auditory filter.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Auditory responses in the barn owl's nucleus laminaris to clicks: impulse response and signal analysis of neurophonic potential.

Authors:  Hermann Wagner; Sandra Brill; Richard Kempter; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Toward Routine Assessments of Auditory Filter Shape.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Allison B Kern; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  The role of spectral resolution, working memory, and audibility in explaining variance in susceptibility to temporal envelope distortion.

Authors:  Evelyn Davies-Venn; Pamela Souza
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  On- and off-frequency forward masking by Schroeder-phase complexes.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-07-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.