Literature DB >> 29223930

Frequency selectivity in macaque monkeys measured using a notched-noise method.

Jane A Burton1, Margit E Dylla2, Ramnarayan Ramachandran3.   

Abstract

The auditory system is thought to process complex sounds through overlapping bandpass filters. Frequency selectivity as estimated by auditory filters has been well quantified in humans and other mammalian species using behavioral and physiological methodologies, but little work has been done to examine frequency selectivity in nonhuman primates. In particular, knowledge of macaque frequency selectivity would help address the recent controversy over the sharpness of cochlear tuning in humans relative to other animal species. The purpose of our study was to investigate the frequency selectivity of macaque monkeys using a notched-noise paradigm. Four macaques were trained to detect tones in noises that were spectrally notched symmetrically and asymmetrically around the tone frequency. Masked tone thresholds decreased with increasing notch width. Auditory filter shapes were estimated using a rounded exponential function. Macaque auditory filters were symmetric at low noise levels and broader and more asymmetric at higher noise levels with broader low-frequency and steeper high-frequency tails. Macaque filter bandwidths (BW3dB) increased with increasing center frequency, similar to humans and other species. Estimates of equivalent rectangular bandwidth (ERB) and filter quality factor (QERB) suggest macaque filters are broader than human filters. These data shed further light on frequency selectivity across species and serve as a baseline for studies of neuronal frequency selectivity and frequency selectivity in subjects with hearing loss.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory filters; Critical band; ERB; Frequency selectivity; Nonhuman primate; Notched-noise

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29223930      PMCID: PMC5743621          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  36 in total

1.  AUDITORY MASKING IN THE RAT.

Authors:  G GOUREVITCH
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory filter bandwidths as a function of level at low frequencies (125 Hz-1 kHz)

Authors:  S Rosen; D Stock
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory-filter characteristics for listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-03

4.  Level dependence of auditory filters in nonsimultaneous masking as a function of frequency.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Andrea M Simonson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Auditory filter shapes at 8 and 10 kHz.

Authors:  M J Shailer; B C Moore; B R Glasberg; N Watson; S Harris
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Psychophysical frequency resolution in the cat as determined by simultaneous masking and its relation to auditory-nerve resolution.

Authors:  J O Pickles
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Critical bands following the selective destruction of cochlear inner and outer hair cells.

Authors:  T G Nienhuys; G M Clark
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.494

9.  Auditory filter shapes in forward masking as a function of level.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Auditory sensitivity of the monkey.

Authors:  W C Stebbins; S Green; F L Miller
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-09-30       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  10 in total

1.  Neural fluctuation cues for simultaneous notched-noise masking and profile-analysis tasks: Insights from model midbrain responses.

Authors:  Braden N Maxwell; Virginia M Richards; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  An assessment of ambient noise and other environmental variables in a nonhuman primate housing facility.

Authors:  Alexander R McLeod; Jane A Burton; Chase A Mackey; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 9.667

3.  Three psychophysical metrics of auditory temporal integration in macaques.

Authors:  Chase Mackey; Alejandro Tarabillo; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.482

4.  Changes in audiometric threshold and frequency selectivity correlate with cochlear histopathology in macaque monkeys with permanent noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Jane A Burton; Chase A Mackey; Kaitlyn S MacDonald; Troy A Hackett; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Correlations between cochlear pathophysiology and behavioral measures of temporal and spatial processing in noise exposed macaques.

Authors:  Chase A Mackey; Jennifer McCrate; Kaitlyn S MacDonald; Jessica Feller; Leslie Liberman; M Charles Liberman; Troy A Hackett; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Multiple sounds degrade the frequency representation in monkey inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Shawn M Willett; Jennifer M Groh
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 3.698

7.  High-resolution frequency tuning but not temporal coding in the human cochlea.

Authors:  Eric Verschooten; Christian Desloovere; Philip X Joris
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Mammalian behavior and physiology converge to confirm sharper cochlear tuning in humans.

Authors:  Christian J Sumner; Toby T Wells; Christopher Bergevin; Joseph Sollini; Heather A Kreft; Alan R Palmer; Andrew J Oxenham; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Tonotopic Selectivity in Cats and Humans: Electrophysiology and Psychophysics.

Authors:  Francois Guérit; John C Middlebrooks; Matthew L Richardson; Akshat Arneja; Andrew J Harland; Robin Gransier; Jan Wouters; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-06-13

Review 10.  The use of nonhuman primates in studies of noise injury and treatment.

Authors:  Jane A Burton; Michelle D Valero; Troy A Hackett; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.482

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.