Literature DB >> 23039443

Evaluating the effects of olivocochlear feedback on psychophysical measures of frequency selectivity.

Skyler G Jennings1, Elizabeth A Strickland.   

Abstract

Frequency selectivity was evaluated under two conditions designed to assess the influence of a "precursor" stimulus on auditory filter bandwidths. The standard condition consisted of a short masker, immediately followed by a short signal. The precursor condition was identical except a 100-ms sinusoid at the signal frequency (i.e., the precursor) was presented before the masker. The standard and precursor conditions were compared for measurements of psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs), and notched noise tuning characteristics. Estimates of frequency selectivity were significantly broader in the precursor condition. In the second experiment, PTCs in the standard and precursor conditions were simulated to evaluate the influence of the precursor on PTC bandwidth. The model was designed to account for the influence of additivity of masking between the masker and precursor. Model simulations were able to qualitatively account for the perceptual data when outer hair cell gain of the model was reduced in the precursor condition. These findings suggest that the precursor may have reduced cochlear gain, in addition to producing additivity of masking. This reduction in gain may be mediated by the medial olivocochlear reflex.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23039443      PMCID: PMC3477188          DOI: 10.1121/1.4742723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  64 in total

1.  A phenomenological model for the responses of auditory-nerve fibers: I. Nonlinear tuning with compression and suppression.

Authors:  X Zhang; M G Heinz; I C Bruce; L H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Forward masking: adaptation or integration?

Authors:  A J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A human nonlinear cochlear filterbank.

Authors:  E A Lopez-Poveda; R Meddis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The use of psychophysical tuning curves to explore dead regions in the cochlea.

Authors:  B C Moore; J I Alcántara
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  A computational algorithm for computing nonlinear auditory frequency selectivity.

Authors:  R Meddis; L P O'Mard; E A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The relationship between frequency selectivity and overshoot.

Authors:  E A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effects of signal delay on auditory filter shapes derived from psychophysical tuning curves and notched-noise data obtained in simultaneous masking.

Authors:  Sid P Bacon; Jennifer L Repovsch-Duffey; Li Liu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Modeling the anti-masking effects of the olivocochlear reflex in auditory nerve responses to tones in sustained noise.

Authors:  Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli; Skyler G Jennings; Michael G Heinz; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-04

9.  A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  D A Nelson; A C Schroder; M Wojtczak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. II. Enhancement of auditory-nerve response to masked tones.

Authors:  T Kawase; B Delgutte; M C Liberman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  18 in total

1.  Computational modeling of individual differences in behavioral estimates of cochlear nonlinearities.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-30

2.  Exploring the role of feedback-based auditory reflexes in forward masking by schroeder-phase complexes.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Jordan A Beim; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-22

3.  Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Provide No Evidence for the Role of Efferents in the Enhancement Effect.

Authors:  Jordan A Beim; Maxwell Elliott; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-08

4.  Psychoacoustic measurements of ipsilateral cochlear gain reduction as a function of signal frequency.

Authors:  Kristina DeRoy Milvae; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Contralateral efferent reflex effects on threshold and suprathreshold psychoacoustical tuning curves at low and high frequencies.

Authors:  Enzo Aguilar; Almudena Eustaquio-Martin; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-20

6.  Accounting for nonmonotonic precursor duration effects with gain reduction in the temporal window model.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and hearing threshold fine structure.

Authors:  James B Dewey; Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-23

Review 8.  Olivocochlear efferents: Their action, effects, measurement and uses, and the impact of the new conception of cochlear mechanical responses.

Authors:  John J Guinan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Effects of age and hearing loss on overshoot.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Auditory filter tuning inferred with short sinusoidal and notched-noise maskers.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.