Literature DB >> 7593916

Additivity of masking in normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.

A J Oxenham1, B C Moore.   

Abstract

The effects of combining two equally effective maskers were studied in normally hearing and elderly hearing-impaired subjects. The additivity of nonsimultaneous masking was investigated by measuring thresholds for a brief 4-kHz signal in the presence of a broadband-noise forward masker, a backward masker, and a combination of both. For the normally hearing subjects, combining two equally effective nonsimultaneous maskers resulted in up to a 15-dB greater increase in threshold than the 3 dB predicted by an energy-summation model ("excess masking"). However, the hearing-impaired subjects showed little or no excess masking. The difference between the two groups is consistent with a theory linking excess masking to the compressive transfer function measured on the basilar membrane (BM). In the hearing-impaired subjects the transfer function is more linear, accounting for the lack of excess masking. The additivity of simultaneous masking was investigated by measuring thresholds for a 100-ms 4-kHz signal in the presence of either a 400-ms broadband noise masker or a 400-ms sinusoidal masker at the same frequency as the signal, and then combining two equally effective maskers, a noise and a tone. The maximum amount of excess masking (3 to 4 dB) was similar across the two groups of subjects, consistent with an explanation based on the use of different detection cues for the tonal and noise maskers. It is argued that, while peripheral compression may underlie excess masking for pairs of nonsimultaneous maskers, it is unlikely that in simultaneous masking, where the maskers are close in frequency to the signal, the two maskers are compressed individually before their effects are combined. It is further suggested that BM nonlinearity may underlie the effects of the upward spread of masking and the nonlinear growth of forward masking, as well as accounting for the additivity of simultaneous masking when the masker frequencies are well below that of the signal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7593916     DOI: 10.1121/1.413376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  22 in total

1.  Forward masking additivity and auditory compression at low and high frequencies.

Authors:  Christopher J Plack; Catherine G O'Hanlon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-09

2.  Effects of background noise level on behavioral estimates of basilar-membrane compression.

Authors:  Melanie J Gregan; Peggy B Nelson; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Interaural fluctuations and the detection of interaural incoherence. IV. The effect of compression on stimulus statistics.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The influence of hearing-aid compression on forward-masked thresholds for adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Marc A Brennan; Ryan W McCreery; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  The role of suppression in the upward spread of masking.

Authors:  Ifat Yasin; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-12

6.  Level dependence of auditory filters in nonsimultaneous masking as a function of frequency.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Andrea M Simonson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Masking by inaudible sounds and the linearity of temporal summation.

Authors:  Christopher J Plack; Andrew J Oxenham; Vit Drga
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Auditory stream formation affects comodulation masking release retroactively.

Authors:  Torsten Dau; Stephan Ewert; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Pitfalls in behavioral estimates of basilar-membrane compression in humans.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Nonadditivity of forward and simultaneous masking.

Authors:  Adam Svec; Suyash N Joshi; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.